Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves.
Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to their academic titles, instead becoming known for making crude jokes and absurd remarks.
In the early 1990s, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who has a research doctorate in law from Harvard, proposed a presidential election system based on “direct election by delegates.” It was an overly complicated, and indirect, proposal in which people elect party representatives who in turn vote for the president of that party. This is the same person who described deer antlers as “the hair inside a deer’s ears.” How can an academic of his level lack so much common sense?
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), who has a doctorate of law from the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, previously said that the legislative and executive branches have a “top-down” relationship, which contradicts Taiwan’s constitutional principle of equal separation of powers.
That is the same as saying that Weng, who won her seat because she was on the KMT’s legislator-at-large list, ranks above Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus secretary-general Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤). Weng’s self-inflated and arrogant attitude is preposterous.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who has a law degree from Cornell University, made a nonsensical statement in defense of TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been entangled in allegations of corruption.
“Ko eats quickly, and those who eat quickly are less likely to be corrupt,” Huang said.
New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has a law degree from Central Police University. As mayor, he said that the issue of nuclear waste must first be solved before addressing other concerns. When he ran in the Jan. 13 presidential election, he announced plans to review and restart construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮), completely ignoring the issue of nuclear waste. The shift in stance made him appear inconsistent and unreliable.
Ko, who holds a doctorate in medicine from National Taiwan University, previously said that accepting the so-called “1992 consensus” would be akin to kneeling down and surrendering to China. However, when he ran for president, he said the “1992 consensus” had been unfairly stigmatized.
Ko has positioned the TPP as an alternative to the DPP-led pan-green coalition and the KMT-led pan-blue coalition, using the color “white” to symbolize his goal of an open and transparent government. Yet, he is now involved in allegations of corruption, and had collaborated with the KMT, and referred to Taiwan and China as “one family” — he is truly a political chameleon.
Ko claims to have an IQ of 157, but once called his own party’s central review committee chairman “a dog.” During his two terms as Taipei mayor, his administration ranked at the bottom among the six special municipalities. Despite having high academic credentials, his practical capabilities are notably lacking.
Ko has said that corruption occurs with the connivance of superiors, who cannot be unaware. When news emerged that the TPP had falsely reported political donations, its superior, Ko, claimed he did not know about it until it was exposed. His moral depths seem limitless. What absurdity.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Nicole Wong
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS