While the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consistently sends drones to harass military bases in Taiwan’s outlying islands and along the coastline, new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo told the Washington Post that the US military would implement a “Hellscape” strategy involving thousands of uncrewed systems to deter a Chinese invasion.
Josh Rogin, who authored the article which was published on Monday last week, spoke to Paparo on the sidelines of the recent Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore.
Paparo told him that as soon as China’s invasion force began to move across the 180km Taiwan Strait, the US military would deploy thousands of uncrewed submarines, surface ships and aerial drones to flood the area and give Taiwanese, US and partner forces time to assemble a full response.
“I want to turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hellscape using a number of classified capabilities,” Paparo said. “So that I can make their [the PLA’s] lives utterly miserable for a month, which buys me the time for the rest of everything.”
A Naval News publication released on Monday analyzing the “hellscape” concept said the US took lessons from Russia’s war on Ukraine, where Ukraine’s deployment of cheap drones had a great effect in repelling Russian advances. Its government since last year has invested in dozens of active programs to develop new uncrewed capabilities, including spending more than US$1 billion on a Replicator Initiative program to build swarms of uncrewed surface ships and aerial drones within the next two years.
Taiwan also has a similar strategy to strengthen deterrence. The Ministry of Defense aims to incorporate uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) into their force buildup plans and produce 7,700 UAVs for military use by 2028, it said in its “Republic of China National Defense Report 2023.”
Taking advantage of the nation’s excellence in information and communication technology, Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that the government would work with private contractors to develop advanced commercial drones for use by the military, such as medium and large military drones and attack drones with military specifications. It also plans to acquire about 1,000 drones equipped with artificial intelligence and machine learning abilities this year, as part of its efforts to bolster the military’s modern combat capabilities, Koo added.
However, China has long been a globally leading country in the mass production of uncrewed vehicles. China’s Da-Jiang Innovations (大疆創新) has become the world’s largest drone maker, supplying more than 70 percent of the world’s consumer drones.
Chinese media reports say the PLA has already established UAV forces for a strategic shift toward drone-led special operations in war scenarios, including a potential conflict with the US over Taiwan.
With China aiming to have the capability to invade Taiwan by 2027, the major and urgent challenges faced by the nation, the US and like-minded allies should be to address funding shortages and increase the capacity for the mass production of UAVs.
It is difficult, but also necessary to remove influence from the Chinese supply chain, since a growing number of Taiwanese and US UAVs have been found to be equipped with components made in China.
Taiwan should also accelerate the buildup of its special forces and facilities for UAV-related warfare, not only to be able to practice UAV operations, but also to fight against the PLA’s UAV attacks and harassment, which have increased rapidly this year.
Setting up a hellscape defense in the Taiwan Strait to deter and break through China’s likely ploy to overwhelm Taiwan with a massive attack, takes not only tens of thousands of UAVs, but also a lot of talented personnel, skilled at asymmetric warfare tactics and strategies.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS