I came to Taiwan from Malaysia in 1990 to study and later got married and settled here. Time has flown by and I have been here for 33 years.
Three decades ago, Taiwanese society was conservative and closed-minded, in that people had an implicit preference for blond-haired, blue-eyed Caucasians over other people. Southeast Asians were referred to as “foreign workers” or “foreign spouses.”
This prevalent bias made me hide my identity to better assimilate. However, I have sensed a shift in the past decade.
National Immigration Agency statistics show that there were 589,868 immigrants living in Taiwan as of October last year.
In terms of birth nationality, China is first, followed by Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Japan, Cambodia and South Korea, among others.
About 400,000 are second-generation “new immigrants,” with first and second-generation new immigrants now being a significant ethnic minority, bordering on 1 million. They have brought diverse culture and labor power and have become an essential driving force of national development.
As a new immigrant, I would like to call on the presidential candidates to transcend party politics, overcome ethnic barriers and think about what they could do for this group. Several areas, in particular, are long overdue:
First, we should be referred to as new immigrants, not “foreign spouses” or “foreign brides,” especially as we are not always female. After the amendment to the Nationality Act (國籍法), many have qualified for permanent residency based on professional knowledge or skills.
Second, the legislature should accelerate legislation for new immigrants. A draft was submitted to the Internal Administration Committee of the Legislative Yuan for review in 2017 and 2022, but has stalled. As a result, there is no special law to protect this group’s rights and interests, and no legal basis when dealing with affairs concerning them. Only by passing this legislation could we strengthen their social standing and carry out measures to protect their cultures and rights.
Third, the government should establish a new immigrants affairs committee. As new immigrants and their children have surpassed the population of indigenous people in Taiwan, the nation must establish a specific institution for addressing new immigrant affairs. So far, the unit in charge is the Immigrant Affairs Division of the Ministry of the Interior, but it is a low-ranking division. Establishing a specific agency should help with planning and policymaking for new immigrants and resource concentration. As Taiwan becomes more diverse, people should remember that new immigrants are already part of the population and stop seeing or treating them like outsiders.
Liang Chin-chun is a lecturer in the Feng Chia University College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS