The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes.
On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing.
Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined.
For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading sharp words under bright lights. These scenes feel decisive. They are easy to interpret.
However, the more consequential shifts are happening elsewhere — quietly, patiently and with far less drama.
China appears comfortable in this slower, less visible arena. Rather than charging into confrontation, Beijing has focused on showing up early in emerging spaces — arctic research, deep-sea exploration, satellite coordination and digital infrastructure. The goal is not always to lead immediately, but to make sure it cannot be ignored when frameworks take shape.
This is less about seizing power and more about securing a presence. Think of it as reserving a seat before the seating plan is finalized. Once the meeting begins, those without a chair do not get to set the agenda.
Democracies often struggle with this kind of competition. Election cycles reward visible toughness, not patient institutional work. Walking away from multilateral forums might look decisive at home, but it leaves empty chairs in rooms where real decisions continue to be made.
Those chairs rarely stay empty.
This dynamic matters deeply for Taiwan.
Taiwan is often framed as a flashpoint — a place where something might erupt. That framing overlooks how Taiwan actually functions. It is already embedded in the systems that keep the modern world running.
Undersea cables carrying global data traffic pass through Taiwan’s surrounding waters. Semiconductor fabs operate around the clock, producing chips that power everything from consumer electronics to advanced defense systems. In government offices and civic technology communities, Taiwan has quietly built one of the world’s most credible models of democratic digital governance.
These are not symbolic contributions. They are structural ones.
Yet when the rules governing these systems are discussed — in standards bodies, regulatory forums and technical alliances — Taiwan is too often left outside the room. Not for lack of expertise, but because political hesitation elsewhere makes exclusion seem easier than inclusion.
The arctic ship offers a useful metaphor. Climate change opened the passage. Technology made it navigable. Strategy determined who sailed first. No single voyage redraws the map, but each early crossing makes the route more real.
Global competition today is no longer about who speaks the loudest, it is about who helps design the environment others must operate in.
For Taiwan, the danger is not irrelevance — it is structural sidelining. Being present everywhere except where rules are formalized is a vulnerability. In a world quietly under construction, absence is not neutral. It shapes the final design.
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor at Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS