The market for China’s video game industry has become quite competitive in recent years. Meanwhile, Beijing has tightened its gaming regulations, leading to consumers losing interest. As a result, China’s video game companies have been investing in overseas markets, including Taiwan’s.
For a long time, China-invested mobile games have topped the ranking charts in Taiwan. In other words, Chinese companies are hugely profiting from Taiwanese. For example, the mobile game Demon Legends developed by China’s Haikou Fengli Network Technology Co was released in traditional Chinese on July 21 for iOS. Since then, it has topped the App Store in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau.
However, it is almost entirely based on the Japanese manga Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba and the publisher never officially authorized it, Japan-based news media Gamebiz said.
Taiwan is the fifth-largest market for mobile games in the world, but more than 40 percent of profit here belongs to Chinese companies. Taiwanese even contributed to that Chinese company involved in copyright infringement.
Taiwan should focus more on how China-invested mobile games are invading Taiwan. Some working in the industry believe that consuming Chinese mobile games is not so much different from sponsoring the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. In fact, the two real problems with Chinese games are information security and censorship.
Last year, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo said that Tencent Holdings Ltd could identify the location of US troops through video games. Moreover, both mobile and computer games could help China collect user data, and built-in programs might pose a threat to network and information security, said US think tank the Center for a New American Security said.
In the past, if overseas gaming companies wanted to enter Taiwan’s market, they had to collaborate with local corporations.
However, today Chinese companies have started services across national borders, with much smaller companies established to address legal and administrative matters. That is, they no longer need a local agent to help them set up game content, servers or customer service making it much harder for the government to protect users’ personal information.
In Taiwan, regulations on Chinese games are far from strict, and the current system is incapable of preventing these companies from encroaching on the market. China-funded companies must be investigated more thoroughly, especially when they operate across national borders.
Taiwan should also monitor the collection, flow and storage of unauthorized data, which might hurt information security.
If needed, the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) should also be revised and carried out more seriously to confront the encroachment of Chinese companies.
In terms of censorship, although international versions of Chinese games are often released, they are not entirely free from China’s censorship system. For instance, Taiwanese and American players of Genshin Impact, a popular mobile game developed by China’s miHoYo, said that their accounts had been locked due to their use of some “sensitive terms,” and they found it difficult to retrieve their accounts through the nations’ consumer protection mechanisms. This way, international users would gradually and unknowingly become much more attentive to whether what they say is in line with China’s standards of censorship. Their self-censorship would work in tandem with China’s “grand external propaganda.” Consequently, values of democracy and freedom would be endangered.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Keelung Councilor Lu Mei-ling’s (呂美玲) remarks that Taiwanese “are asking for a beating,” is a perfect example of how self-censorship affected by China would put national security in jeopardy. For Taiwan, which is directly under China’s threat, confronting the censorship embedded within their video games is a battle of values to which Taiwanese should not be indifferent.
In addition to those video games, Chinese apps such as TikTok and Xiaohongshu (also known as Little Red Book) have already created a series of problems in Taiwanese society.
The government and the Legislative Yuan should be more proactive, and Taiwanese should be aware that China’s integration of entertainment and politics can severely damage their free and democratic society.
India has already banned Chinese apps and video games. It might not be easy for Taiwan to follow suit, but precisely because Taiwanese have options, they should act of their own volition and say no to China-funded games. There are numerous kinds of entertainment for them to choose from — why would they play those video games that have often been accused of plagiarism and that are posing a threat to information security and national safety?
Wu Cheng-yin is a software engineer.
Translated by Emma Liu
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS