The market for China’s video game industry has become quite competitive in recent years. Meanwhile, Beijing has tightened its gaming regulations, leading to consumers losing interest. As a result, China’s video game companies have been investing in overseas markets, including Taiwan’s.
For a long time, China-invested mobile games have topped the ranking charts in Taiwan. In other words, Chinese companies are hugely profiting from Taiwanese. For example, the mobile game Demon Legends developed by China’s Haikou Fengli Network Technology Co was released in traditional Chinese on July 21 for iOS. Since then, it has topped the App Store in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau.
However, it is almost entirely based on the Japanese manga Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba and the publisher never officially authorized it, Japan-based news media Gamebiz said.
Taiwan is the fifth-largest market for mobile games in the world, but more than 40 percent of profit here belongs to Chinese companies. Taiwanese even contributed to that Chinese company involved in copyright infringement.
Taiwan should focus more on how China-invested mobile games are invading Taiwan. Some working in the industry believe that consuming Chinese mobile games is not so much different from sponsoring the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. In fact, the two real problems with Chinese games are information security and censorship.
Last year, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo said that Tencent Holdings Ltd could identify the location of US troops through video games. Moreover, both mobile and computer games could help China collect user data, and built-in programs might pose a threat to network and information security, said US think tank the Center for a New American Security said.
In the past, if overseas gaming companies wanted to enter Taiwan’s market, they had to collaborate with local corporations.
However, today Chinese companies have started services across national borders, with much smaller companies established to address legal and administrative matters. That is, they no longer need a local agent to help them set up game content, servers or customer service making it much harder for the government to protect users’ personal information.
In Taiwan, regulations on Chinese games are far from strict, and the current system is incapable of preventing these companies from encroaching on the market. China-funded companies must be investigated more thoroughly, especially when they operate across national borders.
Taiwan should also monitor the collection, flow and storage of unauthorized data, which might hurt information security.
If needed, the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) should also be revised and carried out more seriously to confront the encroachment of Chinese companies.
In terms of censorship, although international versions of Chinese games are often released, they are not entirely free from China’s censorship system. For instance, Taiwanese and American players of Genshin Impact, a popular mobile game developed by China’s miHoYo, said that their accounts had been locked due to their use of some “sensitive terms,” and they found it difficult to retrieve their accounts through the nations’ consumer protection mechanisms. This way, international users would gradually and unknowingly become much more attentive to whether what they say is in line with China’s standards of censorship. Their self-censorship would work in tandem with China’s “grand external propaganda.” Consequently, values of democracy and freedom would be endangered.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Keelung Councilor Lu Mei-ling’s (呂美玲) remarks that Taiwanese “are asking for a beating,” is a perfect example of how self-censorship affected by China would put national security in jeopardy. For Taiwan, which is directly under China’s threat, confronting the censorship embedded within their video games is a battle of values to which Taiwanese should not be indifferent.
In addition to those video games, Chinese apps such as TikTok and Xiaohongshu (also known as Little Red Book) have already created a series of problems in Taiwanese society.
The government and the Legislative Yuan should be more proactive, and Taiwanese should be aware that China’s integration of entertainment and politics can severely damage their free and democratic society.
India has already banned Chinese apps and video games. It might not be easy for Taiwan to follow suit, but precisely because Taiwanese have options, they should act of their own volition and say no to China-funded games. There are numerous kinds of entertainment for them to choose from — why would they play those video games that have often been accused of plagiarism and that are posing a threat to information security and national safety?
Wu Cheng-yin is a software engineer.
Translated by Emma Liu
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past