Taiwan’s economy has benefited from its advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes and the return of Taiwanese businesses, the Department of Statistics said in a report on April 28. The factors have contributed to Taiwan’s average annual GDP growth of 3.2 percent over the past decade, better than South Korea’s 2.6 percent over the period.
Furthermore, with the recent depreciation of the South Korean won, Taiwan’s GDP per capita of US$32,811 last year once again surpassed that of South Korea, which was US$32,237.
FOREX RATES
GDP per capita is calculated by dividing a country’s GDP by its population. If population is assumed to remain unchanged, the most important factors affecting GDP per capita are foreign exchange rates and GDP growth.
The foreign exchange rate is indeed a key factor in Taiwan’s GDP per capita surpassing that of South Korea.
South Korea, which is economically and industrially similar to Taiwan, used to be a stronger economic power, but has declined significantly in the past few years. On the other hand, the accelerated repatriation of Taiwanese businesses amid US-China tensions and the effect of semiconductor transfer orders have become catalysts for Taiwan’s economic recovery.
INNOVATION
Also contributing to the dynamics that fuels Taiwan’s economic growth are the promotion of industry transformation, innovation and global distribution — especially through value creation and digital transformation — and the continuous improvement of core technologies and gross margins, which has laid a solid foundation for the industry.
Taiwan’s GDP performance is quite impressive, which is indeed worthy of recognition.
However, the nation still has to look beyond the seemingly satisfying statistics, and face up to the hidden problems and figure out the ways to tackle them.
First, Taiwan’s GDP relies too much on technological industries such as semiconductors, information and communication, which can easily lead to the hollowing out of other industries. The latter could in turn suffer from low demand, excessive inventory, inflation, interest rate hikes or other economic effects.
To reduce risks and improve overall output value, the nation must also pay attention to the development of domestic demand industries, such as traditional industries and the service sector, as well as education, tourism, culture and arts, and make good use of digital transformation.
The government should also legislate more complete laws and policies to facilitate such development.
Second, the increase in GDP per capita might be coming from wealthy people, who account for only a fraction of the population, while the wages of the majority are still low. The widening gap between the rich and poor, and the worsening relative deprivation might lead to social problems.
Moreover, people have been experiencing slow wage growth and fast price hikes, and deem GDP growth an “insensitive” figure that cannot truly reflect the difficulties they have to face in real life, such as income inequality, low wages, inflation, rising housing prices and rents, high loan payments, having to work multiple jobs and doing overtime, as well as unemployment, increasing poverty, labor shortages, brain drain and a lower quality of life.
INCOMPLETE MEASURE
Simon Kuznets, a Nobel laureate in economics and an honorary academician at Academia Sinica, has said that GDP reflects objective economic data, but it cannot measure people’s happiness or joy.
The government should not focus only on GDP figures, but also listen to people and see the real problems behind the numbers.
It should strive to solve economic inequality, stabilize prices, encourage companies to raise wages, balance the development of industries and create people-friendly environments, so that Taiwanese can enjoy a good and prosperous life in a sustainable country.
Su Wei-cheng is a lecturer and a former secretary of the president of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS