Another tragic disaster occurred in Xinjiang as dozens, maybe hundreds, of Uighurs died in a fire on Friday.
The Chinese authorities showed no mercy. No officer broke into the building or broke the locks for hours after the fire started roaring out of control. The official reason was that the road leading to the building was narrow and parked vehicles blocked the way. It took three hours until firefighters started to extinguish the fire, despite having arrived at the scene within five minutes.
Where were the skills and courage of Chinese police who had previously stormed into buildings and dragged suspects from their beds into the street during the July 5, 2009, Urumqi Incident? The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Special Operations Forces can clear an area within five minutes, but they need three hours to extinguish a fire?
Presumably, they did not want to save the residents because they were Uighurs. Those who were crying and begging did not speak Chinese. Perhaps the residents were even afraid of being rescued, knowing that the firefighters were waiting for orders from higher authorities in Beijing to take action amid China’s lockdown policy. Women and children in the building wept until the order to break the locks came.
This is not the saddest tragedy that Uighurs are facing, although it is the most obvious one, and China is unable to hide it. We have heard of even more tragic scenes in prisons, camps and starving communities over the past three months in areas that are locked down.
However, China is ignoring the facts and hiding them by restricting news coverage.
The Chinese government in a news release put forth numerous lies, including statements from residents of the burning building who never left their homes.
In the statement, circulated on the Internet, Chinese officials said: “This was a light COVID-19 area, and the residents were able to leave the building.”
This lie is a clear indication of the falsehood of the information that only 10 people died and only nine were injured.
According to the information we received, at least 40 people died and more than 60 people were injured. Three floors of the building burned out, and the other four floors were filled with smoke. The fire lasted hours. It is clear that not just the 19 people mentioned in the official account were affected.
While one of the victims, a woman named Qembernisa, burned to death with her three children, her husband and eldest son, sentenced to jail terms of 10 and 12 years respectively, were not with them. Her five-year-old daughter was born while her father was in prison. She had been counting the months and years until she would be able to see her father and older brother.
The Chinese government should immediately disclose the list of victims and provide an accurate account on the number of dead and injured, take responsibility for the disaster, and publicly apologize to the victims’ families. We know that the Chinese authorities, which are committing genocide in our homeland, will not take responsibility for this on their own, so we call on the international community to demand an independent investigation to determine the facts and to appropriately punish China.
We would like to express our gratitude to the Turkish government for calling on China to report the details of the incident and requesting that other countries, such as the US, the UK, France, Germany, Japan and India not turn a blind eye to this tragedy, which was caused by China’s “zero COVID-19” policy.
Rebiya Kadeer is a former president of the World Uyghur Congress. Kok Bayraq is a Uighur-American observer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry