Following US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, China has not only launched military exercises to intimidate the nation, but also intensified its information warfare activities. The government should therefore not only strengthen its national defense capabilities, but also boost its information warfare prevention efforts.
First, it should close information security loopholes in electronic communications equipment. During Pelosi’s visit, video screens in 7-Eleven convenience stores and railway stations were hacked to display anti-Pelosi messages. Investigations revealed that the advertising media firms that set up the screens used Chinese software, which likely were embedded with backdoor programs to make the equipment easily hackable.
The government should inspect equipment connected to computer networks — display screens, signage, speed cameras, intersection surveillance cameras and camera drones — and immediately replace equipment found to incorporate Chinese products. Information security drills should also be held for government and private institutions to pre-emptively discover and address information security loopholes, and block communist China from penetrating any breaches.
Second, the government should increase efforts to correct and counter disinformation.
A report titled Varieties of Democracy, which was last year published by the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, named Taiwan as the country suffering the most severe cross-border attacks using false information.
During Pelosi’s visit, false reports such as “Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport has been attacked by missiles and Taiwan’s air defenses failed to intercept them,” and “Sukhoi Su-35 jet fighters are crossing the Taiwan Strait” were circulating on the Internet. The government should closely monitor such messages and promptly dispel any rumors to stop disinformation from spreading and causing panic.
Faced with China’s manipulation of information and dissemination of false information, the government should propose countermeasures.
It should follow the example of the “Great Translation Movement,” which has emerged in response to the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.
This movement translates pro-Russian, anti-Ukrainian, anti-US and anti-Japanese statements that circulate on the Chinese Internet into other languages to expose them to the international community, unmasking the pretense of China’s “neutrality” in the Russia-Ukraine war.
The government should recruit speakers of English, Japanese, French and other foreign languages to translate anti-Taiwan messages originating in China, whether they come from official Chinese Communist Party or Chinese government sources, or from “Little Pink” online nationalists, and make them known to the international community to counter China’s information manipulation and external propaganda.
Unlike conventional warfare, information warfare does not distinguish between peacetime and wartime.
The government should move quickly to bolster its defense and response mechanisms in the face of network infiltration and disinformation attacks. Only if it does so can Taiwan win this “war without bullets.”
Wang Yu-pei is a civil servant.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath