There were about 25,000 fraud crimes in Taiwan last year, up 5 percent from 2020, and stolen funds totaled NT$5 billion (US$167.01 million), Criminal Investigation Bureau data showed.
The figures have continued to increase in the first half of this year, with 13,301 cases and stolen funds totaling NT$3.1 billion.
If the government cannot curb the trend, stolen funds could exceed NT$6 billion at the end of the year.
The bureau has been promoting “keyword filtering” to rein in telephone fraud, adding a second major measure to its 165 anti-fraud hotline.
Telefraud schemes such as investment scams pretending to offer services on behalf of financial institutions have become increasingly common.
A massive amount of such scams are using instant messaging services such as Line, Telegram or iMessage. In contrast to text message scams, the origins of the instant messaging scams that pop up on people’s smartphones almost every day are untraceable.
The bureau says it only intercepts about 6 percent of scams using instant messaging, showing that its fraud prevention tools are nearly useless in this field.
Even if the police manage to solve a case of instant messaging fraud, those who orchestrate and fund the scams behind the scenes usually go unpunished, as police can only seize the dummy accounts and mobile phones used, and punish those who provided them and collect the defrauded money.
Meanwhile, fraud groups constantly come up with new tricks, and when things go wrong and they get raided, only the groups’ foot soldiers are caught, mostly receiving light legal penalties.
The problem has become even more complex due to the rise of cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens and third-party payment services that allow anonymous transactions.
As it has not been clearly defined which law enforcement agency is in charge of investigating new types of fraud, victims do not know who to turn to. This makes it much more difficult for police to investigate fraud cases.
To prevent these crimes from happening, Taiwan should improve the public’s financial and legal literacy to reduce the number of potential victims. Better ways of dealing with the diversity of fraud schemes should also be explored.
This can hardly be resolved by a single agency. It would require coordination among agencies, including the Ministry of Justice, the National Communications Commission, the Financial Supervisory Commission and the National Police Agency.
They should integrate their anti-fraud resources and work with one another to fight telefraud.
Dino Wei is an information engineer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.