When US President Joe Biden visits the Middle East next month, his hosts — in particular, Saudi Arabia — will probably try to persuade him to re-engage with the region. Far from enabling the US to focus on strengthening its position in the great-power competition with China and Russia, they might argue, strategic disengagement from the Middle East gives China an opening to bolster its own regional influence.
However, the reality is not that simple.
As a major fossil-fuel producer, the Middle East is clearly important to the US. In fact, it is sky-high energy prices that have forced Biden to try to patch up his relationship with Saudi Arabia. Until recently, Biden was shunning Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, the country’s de facto ruler, over his alleged role in the murder of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey in 2018.
Biden’s about-face highlights the extent of Saudi Arabia’s leverage and the kingdom is likely to use that leverage to urge the US to sustain its military engagement in the Middle East.
Warnings — which Israel is likely to echo — that China will quickly move to fill any security vacuum left by the US will seem to bolster its case further.
However, China is unlikely to establish a military footprint in the Middle East, not least because its key partners in the region — Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — are adversaries of one another. While Iran and Saudi Arabia, for example, are willing to do business with the same actors, neither would maintain good relations with a country that was cultivating a substantial security relationship with its main rival.
China’s hesitation to advance its security interests in the Middle East suggests that it is well aware of this. Even in the case of Iran, which could serve as a proxy in China’s strategic rivalry with the US, China has avoided steps that could jeopardize its relations with Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states.
For example, unlike Russia, it has refrained from providing advanced weapons to Iran.
Even if China had more room to maneuver strategically in the Middle East, it might not significantly expand its strategic footprint there, because it does not view the region as critical to its security.
While the Middle East accounts for nearly half of China’s oil imports, the most important theater in the unfolding US-China cold war is East and Southeast Asia. China does not want to expend limited resources in the Middle East any more than the US does.
Against this background, China is likely to continue relying on diplomatic and economic tools to expand its influence in the Middle East. The only way to counter these efforts, it seems clear, is for the US to raise its diplomatic and economic game.
This means, first and foremost, abandoning the effort to frame Washington’s strategic competition with China and Russia as an ideological contest between democracy and autocracy. After all, the vast majority of Middle Eastern countries are autocracies. The last thing the US needs is to alienate them with an overtly ideological foreign policy that enables China to portray itself as a more reliable, supportive and like-minded partner.
Economic engagement remains China’s most effective tool to expand its geopolitical influence. In 2020, merchandise trade between China and the Middle East totaled US$272 billion. Although comparable figures are not available for US trade with the Middle East as a whole, the trajectory of the two powers’ trade with Saudi Arabia is revealing. While the US’ trade turnover with Saudi Arabia rose only moderately between 2000 and last year — from US$20.5 billion to US$24.8 billion — China’s soared, from US$3 billion to US$67 billion.
On technology, the US might be giving China yet another opening. The West has long used sanctions as a tool to punish “rogue” countries, with Iran as a case in point, but the comprehensive technological and financial sanctions imposed on Russia over the war in Ukraine have compounded fears in Middle Eastern countries that they, too, might be targeted.
As China builds up its technological and innovative capacity, it can present itself as a more reliable source of technology and a safer investment destination. It is telling that no Middle Eastern country has banned the Chinese telecom giant Huawei Technologies Co’s 5G networks, despite strong US lobbying.
While the case for a new Middle East strategy focused on diplomatic and economic engagement is strong, any attempt by Biden to implement one will meet significant resistance. Befriending dictators will lead to charges of hypocrisy — the last thing Biden needs months before midterm elections in which his Democratic Party is unlikely to perform well — and protectionist sentiment remains strong in the US.
However, if Biden frames the shift as part of a larger strategy for winning the new cold war with China, he might have a chance.
Pei Minxin, a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College, is a non-resident senior fellow at the Washington-based German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, CLAREMONT, California
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS