More than 400 domestic COVID-19 cases have been reported in Taiwan this year, and new daily case counts remain in the double digits.
The CECC on Monday extended a level 2 COVID-19 alert for two more weeks, slightly tightening mask rules, but allowing indoor dining and not imposing gathering limits.
“We need to get on with our lives, so everyone should be responsible for disease prevention and get vaccinated, as remaining vigilant has become the ‘new normal,’” Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC), said on Thursday.
Many people have expressed concerns about increased infection risks as people move about during the Lunar New Year holidays. This could lead to a surge in cases, and some questioned why the alert was not raised to level 3, as the local situation has met last year’s criteria of “having more than three local clusters of infections within one week.”
Responding to public concerns, the center on Thursday released a set of COVID-19 prevention guidelines for the holidays, mainly reminding people to practice personal protective measures, avoid crowded gatherings with strangers, get fully vaccinated, wear a mask and practice social distancing when meeting people.
Chen said that family gatherings are an important part of family relationships, and celebrations can take place as long as people practice preventive measures.
The policies now are much looser than those implemented during the Dragon Boat Festival long weekend in June last year, when the government reduced public transportation and urged people to avoid traveling home.
“Zero COVID is not our goal, but it is our attitude in conducting disease prevention operations,” said Victor Wang (王必勝), deputy head of the CECC’s medical response division and the center’s on-site commander at several large cluster infection sites.
The minister’s mention of the “new normal” seems to suggest that the center is shifting toward a risk mitigation strategy, as eradicating the highly transmissible Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is difficult, and tools to protect people against serious illness and death have become widely available.
Instead of significantly tightening domestic restrictions and imposing fines, the center is asking everyone to assess their risk and shoulder the responsibility of disease prevention.
However, when the CECC emphasizes a rolling review of policies in response to the rapidly changing COVID-19 environment, it can be confusing to the public. Previous criteria for issuing alert levels, conducting mandatory testing and placing contacts under isolation are no longer reliable, and the visions for a “new normal” remain indistinct.
What does it mean when the center is taking a “zero COVID” approach, yet people must prepare to live with the virus? How does the government plan to balance public health and reduce disruption to society? And how do people assess their risk and make the best choices if living with COVID-19 is inevitable?
Aside from reporting the latest daily case counts, contact tracing progress and measures taken to contain the spread of infections, it would be helpful if the CECC offered analytical data from scientific studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions and the recommended vaccine doses needed to protect people from COVID-19 infection or severe disease.
The government should review its isolation policy and other guidelines that have become less effective in defeating the Omicron variant. It should also inform the public about the nation’s healthcare capacity. These measures along with clear communication would help the public remain relatively safe and live with COVID-19.
It is a good time to be in the air-conditioning business. As my colleagues at Bloomberg News write, an additional 1 billion cooling units are expected to be installed by the end of the decade. It is one of the main ways in which humans are adapting to more frequent and intense heatwaves. With a potentially strong El Nino on the horizon — a climate pattern that increases global temperatures — and greenhouse gas emissions still higher than ever, the world is facing another record-breaking summer, and another one, and another and so on. For many, owning an air conditioner has become a
Election seasons expose societal divisions and contrasting visions about the future of Taiwan. They also offer opportunities for leaders to forge unity around practical ideas for strengthening Taiwan’s resilience. Beijing has in the past sought to exacerbate divisions within Taiwan. For Beijing, a divided Taiwan is less likely to pursue permanent separation. It also is more manipulatable than a united Taiwan. A divided polity has lower trust in government institutions and diminished capacity to solve societal challenges. As my co-authors Richard Bush, Bonnie Glaser, and I recently wrote in our book US-Taiwan Relations: Will China’s Challenge Lead to a Crisis?, “Beijing wants
Taiwanese students spend thousands of hours studying English. Yet after three to five class-hours of English as a foreign language every week for more than nine years, most students can barely utter a sentence of English. The government’s “Bilingual Nation 2030” policy would do little to change this. As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies would soon be able to translate in real time, why should students squander so much of their youth and potential on learning a foreign language? AI might save students time, but it should not replace language learning. Instead, the technology could amplify learning, and it might also enhance
National Taiwan University (NTU) has come under fire after an offensive set of proposals by two students running for president and vice president of the student council caused an uproar over the weekend. Among the proposals were requiring girls with “boobs smaller than an A cup” to take two national defense credits and boys with “dicks shorter than 10cm” to take home economics class, as well as banning people with a body mass index of more than 20 from taking elevators, and barring LGBTQ students and dogs from playing Arena of Valor during student council meetings. They also opposed admission
RSS