The purpose of epidemic response news conferences is precisely what it says: to respond to an epidemic. In this age of social media, people’s attention is precious. These news conferences are about an important issue that affects people’s lives, which is an advantage in attracting attention. When used properly, they efficiently promote epidemic prevention measures, but if this advantage is wasted and the briefings are used for issues unrelated to the epidemic, the audience loses patience.
Taiwan’s initial COVID-19 outbreak last year abated quickly. As time went by, the Central Epidemic Command Center’s news conferences were increasingly used for promoting farm products and stimulating local economies. Although this was done with people’s livelihoods in mind, the events strayed from their purpose, attracting criticism.
As a resident of Taipei, I expect the city government’s epidemic response news conferences to provide useful information on disease prevention and answer queries the public might have.
However, on Sept. 15, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) used a reporter’s question to discuss doubts raised by the Ministry of the Interior about social housing. At the time, I said that the next time reporters ask questions unrelated to the topic, Ko might find it hard to justify not answering.
Since that day, the city has held seven more epidemic response news conferences, at each of which reporters asked 10 to 20 questions and follow-ups.
On Sept. 24 there were questions about Taiwan joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, social housing and the academic credentials of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安).
On Sept. 27, a reporter asked whether supporters of Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中) might join the TPP, which the reporter said might cause a split in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Another asked about newly elected KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) reply to a congratulatory telegram from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and a third asked about the Taipei Department of Civil Affairs’ policy to encourage people to get married.
On Sept. 29, there were questions about appointments in the Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office, the TPP’s approach to cross-strait issues and its plans for the Taipei City Council election, as well as about Kao’s apology for singing a song that mocks supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
On Oct. 4, reporters asked questions about statues of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) on school and college campuses, footage of a Swiss mountain featuring in a Ministry of Foreign Affairs promotional film, the National Human Rights Commission’s budget, how many followers President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on Instagram, media attacks on Ko and questions about the TPP’s strategy for the city council election.
On Oct. 6, a reporter asked whether the DPP had double standards and another asked about the location of the high-speed rail’s future terminus in Yilan County.
On Oct. 8, reporters asked how the TPP was using its income from political donations, whether Ko would cooperate with Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and where one could buy a bowl of oyster noodles for NT$20, as well as a final question about Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟).
The second half of the epidemic response news conferences’ question-and-answer session no longer has anything to do with epidemic prevention.
The unrelated questions belong to two main categories:
The first is related to city governance. Ko’s mayorship stresses efficiency, so it is understandable if he thinks he can save resources by using this opportunity to answer questions about city governance.
However, the TPP’s election strategy, and Ko’s views on other parties’ policies and personnel, are party matters that have nothing to do with city governance. He really should not respond to such questions on these occasions.
If reporters ask questions outside the framework of a news conference, that is an expression of their autonomy, but the Taipei City Government should not use its epidemic prevention resources to discuss party affairs and promote personal political ideas.
Taipei residents’ interest in epidemic prevention measures should not be abused for such unrelated matters.
Chang Yueh-han holds a doctorate in journalism and communications from Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS