The purpose of epidemic response news conferences is precisely what it says: to respond to an epidemic. In this age of social media, people’s attention is precious. These news conferences are about an important issue that affects people’s lives, which is an advantage in attracting attention. When used properly, they efficiently promote epidemic prevention measures, but if this advantage is wasted and the briefings are used for issues unrelated to the epidemic, the audience loses patience.
Taiwan’s initial COVID-19 outbreak last year abated quickly. As time went by, the Central Epidemic Command Center’s news conferences were increasingly used for promoting farm products and stimulating local economies. Although this was done with people’s livelihoods in mind, the events strayed from their purpose, attracting criticism.
As a resident of Taipei, I expect the city government’s epidemic response news conferences to provide useful information on disease prevention and answer queries the public might have.
However, on Sept. 15, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) used a reporter’s question to discuss doubts raised by the Ministry of the Interior about social housing. At the time, I said that the next time reporters ask questions unrelated to the topic, Ko might find it hard to justify not answering.
Since that day, the city has held seven more epidemic response news conferences, at each of which reporters asked 10 to 20 questions and follow-ups.
On Sept. 24 there were questions about Taiwan joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, social housing and the academic credentials of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安).
On Sept. 27, a reporter asked whether supporters of Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中) might join the TPP, which the reporter said might cause a split in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Another asked about newly elected KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) reply to a congratulatory telegram from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and a third asked about the Taipei Department of Civil Affairs’ policy to encourage people to get married.
On Sept. 29, there were questions about appointments in the Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office, the TPP’s approach to cross-strait issues and its plans for the Taipei City Council election, as well as about Kao’s apology for singing a song that mocks supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
On Oct. 4, reporters asked questions about statues of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) on school and college campuses, footage of a Swiss mountain featuring in a Ministry of Foreign Affairs promotional film, the National Human Rights Commission’s budget, how many followers President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on Instagram, media attacks on Ko and questions about the TPP’s strategy for the city council election.
On Oct. 6, a reporter asked whether the DPP had double standards and another asked about the location of the high-speed rail’s future terminus in Yilan County.
On Oct. 8, reporters asked how the TPP was using its income from political donations, whether Ko would cooperate with Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and where one could buy a bowl of oyster noodles for NT$20, as well as a final question about Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟).
The second half of the epidemic response news conferences’ question-and-answer session no longer has anything to do with epidemic prevention.
The unrelated questions belong to two main categories:
The first is related to city governance. Ko’s mayorship stresses efficiency, so it is understandable if he thinks he can save resources by using this opportunity to answer questions about city governance.
However, the TPP’s election strategy, and Ko’s views on other parties’ policies and personnel, are party matters that have nothing to do with city governance. He really should not respond to such questions on these occasions.
If reporters ask questions outside the framework of a news conference, that is an expression of their autonomy, but the Taipei City Government should not use its epidemic prevention resources to discuss party affairs and promote personal political ideas.
Taipei residents’ interest in epidemic prevention measures should not be abused for such unrelated matters.
Chang Yueh-han holds a doctorate in journalism and communications from Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS