Few would dispute that China’s crackdown on cryptocurrency trading and mining has contributed to the plunge in the value of bitcoin and other cryptos.
However, while the argument rages about whether the volatility of cryptos is a sign of fundamental weakness or merely a bump along the road, the initiatives coming out of Beijing are being seen by experts as a sign of China’s attempts to incubate its own fledgling e-currency and reboot the international financial system.
The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) aims to become the first major central bank to issue a central bank digital currency. While the PBOC’s counterparts in the West have taken a more cautious approach, it has held trials in several major cities including Shenzhen, Chengdu, Shanghai and Hangzhou.
Illustration: Yusha
The benefits of an e-currency are immense. As more and more transactions are made using a digital currency controlled centrally, the government gains more and more ability to monitor the economy and its people.
The rollout is also seen as part of Beijing’s push to weaken the power of the US dollar, and in turn that of the government in Washington. China believes that by internationalizing the yuan it can reduce its dependence on the dollar-dominated global banking system, just as its Belt and Road Initiative is building an alternative network of international trade.
Alarm in Western governments is such that the threat posed by the digital yuan, which could put China out of reach from international financial sanctions, for example, was discussed at last month’s G7 meeting.
However, another crucial motivation is the increasing alarm in Beijing at the size of the crypto industry in China, where a huge amount of cryptocurrency was being “mined” until the crackdown.
THREAT TO BEIJING
The threat of an unregulated alternative monetary system emerging from blockchain technology is a clear and present danger to the Chinese Communist Party, observers have said.
Former hedge fund manager and CNN business expert Jim Cramer said government leaders in Beijing “believe it’s a direct threat to the regime because... it is outside their control.”
Seen from the perspective of central banks, cryptocurrencies are a threat to financial stability, and if digital currencies are to be developed, then authorities want control, University of Melbourne finance professor Carsten Murawski said.
“All central banks want to control them — the PBOC, the US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank,” he said. “They have no interest in parallel currencies floating around. Some countries might not be too worried, but in China it could be more of a concern.”
On Thursday, PBOC deputy governor Fan Yifei (范一非) said China was concerned about the threat posed by these digital currencies developed outside the regulated financial system.
“We are still quite worried about this issue, so we have taken some measures,” Fan said.
The value of bitcoin shot up to a record high earlier this year of almost US$65,000, having been worth less than US$10,000 in the middle of last year, sparking a frenzy of interest in the cryptos as an investment to hedge against more traditional assets such as stocks and bonds. Comments by Tesla CEO Elon Musk that he would not allow bitcoin to be used to buy his cars added to the volatility, and it is now trading slightly above US$30,000.
However, that has also attracted
the attention of authorities such as those in China concerned about the largely unregulated market.
“In many countries it is completely unregulated — it is the absolute wild west,” said Murawski, who also pointed out that there might not be the usual legal avenues to pursue if people thought they had been defrauded.
“So that’s another reason to control cryptos: to protect the consumer. Uninformed investors could lose a huge amount of money,” Murawski said.
CURRENCY CRACKDOWN
In China, the rollout of the digital yuan has sped up this year in tandem with the outlawing of crypto trading. In May, the PBOC banned banks from doing business or providing accounts for anyone trading in cryptocurrencies. It was followed by the outlawing of bitcoin mining in several provinces, including Sichuan.
On Tuesday, China’s central bank warned companies against assisting cryptocurrency-related businesses as it shut down a software firm over suspected involvement in digital currency transactions. Fan said on Thursday that cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin had become “tools for speculation” and were bringing potential risks to financial security and social stability.
Online businesses have been allowed to prosper in China, but the government in Beijing has been ruthless in cutting them down to size if they appear to be getting too big to control. Jack Ma (馬雲), the high-profile billionaire founder of the Alibaba empire, disappeared abruptly from public view for months last year, and his company was fined and ordered to downsize.
Regulators have also targeted tech giants Tencent and Bytedance, the respective parent companies of WeChat and TikTok, and this week ordered ridesharing app Didi be pulled from app stores and launched an inquiry.
Renmin University of China researcher Dong Shaopeng (董紹鵬) said that some online industries such as cryptocurrencies had reached an “alarming” size.
“It’s time for the government to block such transactions from capital sources, so that money will stop flowing from real industries to those transactions,” Dong told the Global Times.
Yet another reason why China wants to clean up the cryptocurrency business on its own patch is the possible threat to the electricity system, Murawski said.
The cryptocurrency mining process uses a huge amount of electricity and has tended to be set up in areas where cheap power is available. In China that has included Sichuan, which benefits from abundant and cheap hydroelectric power, but as profits rise thanks to the popularity of cryptos, governments might be becoming less willing to allow miners to accrue huge benefits from a system that uses so much electricity that it can threaten the stability of the power grid.
The crackdown on cryptos is not limited to China. The UK’s financial regulator said last month that Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, cannot conduct any regulated activity and issued a warning to consumers about the platform.
However, cryptos remain an extremely attractive asset for many investors who see nothing to fear from China’s crackdown and that mining will simply migrate to more accommodating jurisdictions with little impact on the market.
Michael Saylor, cofounder of the business intelligence company MicroStrategy and one of cryptos’ biggest cheerleaders, recently bought an additional 13,005 bitcoins for roughly US$489 million at an average price of US$37,617 per coin, and the Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz just launched a US$2 billion crypto fund and announced it was “radically optimistic about crypto’s potential to restore trust and enable new kinds of governance.”
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
Reading Lee Min-yung’s (李敏勇) article (“Taiwanese must unite to protect our nation,” Aug. 16, page 8) about Taiwan’s unfinished nationhood struck a chord with me. His reminder that Taiwan must raise its own banner of identity reminded me of my story as a Hong Konger born in the 1960s who lived through the loss of that very freedom. Hong Kong was ceded to the UK in 1842 and remained under British rule for 155 years. It grew from a fishing port into an international financial center — once dubbed the “Pearl of the Orient.” These achievements had nothing to do with
RSS