Outside one of Bangkok’s busy shopping arcades, crowds of young protesters bounce balloons — colored gray with patches of molten orange — above their heads.
“We will act as a meteorite and hit the outdated ways of the older generations in this country,” the protest organizers said. “We will talk about all the topics that the dinosaurs don’t want to hear.”
Inflatable dinosaurs wobbled in the afternoon heat, representing the Thai government. The symbols are playful, but the message is clear: Teenagers want change.
A student-led protest movement has shaken Thailand over the past five months. Young people have taken to the streets to call for a true democracy, and have risked jail to shatter a taboo that has long prevented frank, public discussion of the monarchy.
Their protests, attended by tens of thousands, present one of the boldest challenges that the Thai royal family has faced in living memory.
Demonstrators say they are not calling for the monarchy to be abolished, but for it to be reformed, accountable to the people and not above the law.
They have also called for Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, a former army general who came to power in a 2014 coup, to stand down, and for changes to the constitution to make the political system more democratic.
Few topics have been left untouched by the movement. At Saturday’s rally, organized by Bad Students, a group that represents school pupils, protesters called not only for monarchy and government reform, but also an overhaul of the education system.
The students want investment in schools, and an end to the military influence and rigid hierarchies that continue to dominate classrooms, stifling freedom of expression.
Bad Students has shone a spotlight on abusive behavior by teachers — from the use of humiliating punishments such as cutting students’ hair if it is considered inappropriate, to the continued use of corporal punishment, despite it being banned.
The group has also campaigned for greater protections for female and LGBT students.
One student, dressed in a school uniform and her mouth taped shut, on Saturday held a sign that read: “I have been sexually abused by teachers. School is not a safe place.”
“Authoritarianism doesn’t only manifest through the manipulation of elections, it is exercised in everyday life,” said Janjira Sombatpoonsiri, an assistant professor of political science at Thammasat University in Bangkok.
Students say they want room for freedom of thought, and a curriculum that allows for different interpretations of Thailand’s past.
“History always mentions the good side of Thailand — changing the story, framing others, admiring someone in the sky,” said a speaker at Saturday’s rally, referring to the king.
The current syllabus glorifies the role of the royal family, but includes very little on the more sensitive episodes in Thailand’s history — including the massacre of pro-democracy university students in the 1970s.
“The monarchy should be on the curriculum, but it should be the truth,” said a 15-year-old, who, like all protesters, asked not to be named.
Her parents did not know she had come to protest, she added.
On her wrist, she wore a pink band to show she is aged under 18.
Amnesty International, and other rights groups at the rally, handed out orange and pink wristbands to indicate whether a protester was aged under 18 or 15. They hoped it would remind the authorities to protect the safety of young demonstrators.
On Tuesday last week, at a much larger rally organized by university students, water cannons containing chemical irritants were fired at protesters, as well as tear gas and pepper spray grenades.
Despite a huge police presence, opposing groups of royalist Yellow Shirts and pro-democracy students were allowed to confront one another, leading to violent clashes.
By the end of the night, six people had been shot and dozens treated for other injuries.
Students accused the police of unfair treatment and of failing to protect them. At a rally the next day, they pelted police headquarters with paint.
There is the risk of further clashes between royalists and protesters, said Matthew Wheeler, a senior analyst for the International Crisis Group, who fears such violence “could be a pretext for a coup d’etat to ‘restore order.’”
“What comes after any future coup is also worrying. If it were to presage a severe clampdown on dissent, it could spark a broader conflict,” he added.
Prayuth last week said that “all laws, all articles” would be used to take action against protesters, suggesting that charges could be filed under a harsh lese-majeste law.
Authorities have so far stopped short of using the law, which carries a 15-year sentence for anyone who “defames, insults or threatens the king, queen, heir-apparent or regent.”
Other charges have been used widely. So far, 175 people have been charged with sedition, which carries a maximum seven-year sentence, or public assembly offences.
This includes two of the teenage organizers behind Bad Students — Benjamaporn Nivas, 15, and Lopnaphat Wangsit, 17.
Yet, as the authorities hint at a further a crackdown, protesters have vowed to escalate their rallies.
They are driven not only by renewed anger at the response of the police, but also over parliament’s recent decision to refuse one of their key demands — to change the Thai constitution so that the monarchy is accountable, and so that military-appointed senators are replaced with elected officials.
Instead, members of parliament and senators agreed to set up a committee to draft reforms. Even this will take months, and no changes will be made in relation to the monarchy — an institution that, according to the current charter, must be “enthroned in a position of revered worship.”
“In the past, at least you pretended to listen to protesters and there is a pseudo-negotiation round,” said Janjira, who added that the authorities may be attempting to push pro-democracy protesters into being aggressive on the streets in order to justify a crackdown.
“We are reaching a very dangerous point,” she said.
At rallies, protesters hold signs mocking recent comments from King Maha Vajiralongkorn who, asked about the protests, described Thailand as the “land of compromise.”
“How dare he lie about that. The system is not like that at all,” one 17-year-old said. “They don’t listen to our voices. They didn’t listen to us because it is not to their benefit.”
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had