Outside one of Bangkok’s busy shopping arcades, crowds of young protesters bounce balloons — colored gray with patches of molten orange — above their heads.
“We will act as a meteorite and hit the outdated ways of the older generations in this country,” the protest organizers said. “We will talk about all the topics that the dinosaurs don’t want to hear.”
Inflatable dinosaurs wobbled in the afternoon heat, representing the Thai government. The symbols are playful, but the message is clear: Teenagers want change.
A student-led protest movement has shaken Thailand over the past five months. Young people have taken to the streets to call for a true democracy, and have risked jail to shatter a taboo that has long prevented frank, public discussion of the monarchy.
Their protests, attended by tens of thousands, present one of the boldest challenges that the Thai royal family has faced in living memory.
Demonstrators say they are not calling for the monarchy to be abolished, but for it to be reformed, accountable to the people and not above the law.
They have also called for Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, a former army general who came to power in a 2014 coup, to stand down, and for changes to the constitution to make the political system more democratic.
Few topics have been left untouched by the movement. At Saturday’s rally, organized by Bad Students, a group that represents school pupils, protesters called not only for monarchy and government reform, but also an overhaul of the education system.
The students want investment in schools, and an end to the military influence and rigid hierarchies that continue to dominate classrooms, stifling freedom of expression.
Bad Students has shone a spotlight on abusive behavior by teachers — from the use of humiliating punishments such as cutting students’ hair if it is considered inappropriate, to the continued use of corporal punishment, despite it being banned.
The group has also campaigned for greater protections for female and LGBT students.
One student, dressed in a school uniform and her mouth taped shut, on Saturday held a sign that read: “I have been sexually abused by teachers. School is not a safe place.”
“Authoritarianism doesn’t only manifest through the manipulation of elections, it is exercised in everyday life,” said Janjira Sombatpoonsiri, an assistant professor of political science at Thammasat University in Bangkok.
Students say they want room for freedom of thought, and a curriculum that allows for different interpretations of Thailand’s past.
“History always mentions the good side of Thailand — changing the story, framing others, admiring someone in the sky,” said a speaker at Saturday’s rally, referring to the king.
The current syllabus glorifies the role of the royal family, but includes very little on the more sensitive episodes in Thailand’s history — including the massacre of pro-democracy university students in the 1970s.
“The monarchy should be on the curriculum, but it should be the truth,” said a 15-year-old, who, like all protesters, asked not to be named.
Her parents did not know she had come to protest, she added.
On her wrist, she wore a pink band to show she is aged under 18.
Amnesty International, and other rights groups at the rally, handed out orange and pink wristbands to indicate whether a protester was aged under 18 or 15. They hoped it would remind the authorities to protect the safety of young demonstrators.
On Tuesday last week, at a much larger rally organized by university students, water cannons containing chemical irritants were fired at protesters, as well as tear gas and pepper spray grenades.
Despite a huge police presence, opposing groups of royalist Yellow Shirts and pro-democracy students were allowed to confront one another, leading to violent clashes.
By the end of the night, six people had been shot and dozens treated for other injuries.
Students accused the police of unfair treatment and of failing to protect them. At a rally the next day, they pelted police headquarters with paint.
There is the risk of further clashes between royalists and protesters, said Matthew Wheeler, a senior analyst for the International Crisis Group, who fears such violence “could be a pretext for a coup d’etat to ‘restore order.’”
“What comes after any future coup is also worrying. If it were to presage a severe clampdown on dissent, it could spark a broader conflict,” he added.
Prayuth last week said that “all laws, all articles” would be used to take action against protesters, suggesting that charges could be filed under a harsh lese-majeste law.
Authorities have so far stopped short of using the law, which carries a 15-year sentence for anyone who “defames, insults or threatens the king, queen, heir-apparent or regent.”
Other charges have been used widely. So far, 175 people have been charged with sedition, which carries a maximum seven-year sentence, or public assembly offences.
This includes two of the teenage organizers behind Bad Students — Benjamaporn Nivas, 15, and Lopnaphat Wangsit, 17.
Yet, as the authorities hint at a further a crackdown, protesters have vowed to escalate their rallies.
They are driven not only by renewed anger at the response of the police, but also over parliament’s recent decision to refuse one of their key demands — to change the Thai constitution so that the monarchy is accountable, and so that military-appointed senators are replaced with elected officials.
Instead, members of parliament and senators agreed to set up a committee to draft reforms. Even this will take months, and no changes will be made in relation to the monarchy — an institution that, according to the current charter, must be “enthroned in a position of revered worship.”
“In the past, at least you pretended to listen to protesters and there is a pseudo-negotiation round,” said Janjira, who added that the authorities may be attempting to push pro-democracy protesters into being aggressive on the streets in order to justify a crackdown.
“We are reaching a very dangerous point,” she said.
At rallies, protesters hold signs mocking recent comments from King Maha Vajiralongkorn who, asked about the protests, described Thailand as the “land of compromise.”
“How dare he lie about that. The system is not like that at all,” one 17-year-old said. “They don’t listen to our voices. They didn’t listen to us because it is not to their benefit.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95