President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) began her second term on Wednesday last week amid the COVID-19 pandemic, a major lesson from which nations worldwide are learning is the importance of a well-funded, robust and accessible health service.
Taiwanese have good reason to be proud of their excellent National Health Insurance (NHI) system, but the system is itself in poor health.
In December last year, the media reported that the total expenditure of the NHI had exceeded NT$700 billion (US$23.31 billion at the current exchange rate), with a deficit between NT$50 billion and NT$60 billion. At this rate, the system could go bankrupt next year, National Health Insurance Administration data showed.
Solutions include cutting costs or increasing revenue, or a combination of the two. The government has favored cutting costs, reluctant to increase premiums because it believed this to be politically unpopular.
At a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee on Monday, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) said that the nation’s high incidence of chronic disease is placing a huge burden on the healthcare system.
She said that NT$51.3 billion was spent last year on kidney dialysis and NT$23.1 billion on diabetes, and asked whether the government should consider levying an “obesity tax” on high-calorie and high-sugar foods.
At the Central Epidemic Command Center’s daily briefing the next day, Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said the government was looking at funding possibilities, adding that raising the NHI premium is not on its list of priorities.
Other nations, notably the UK and Mexico, have implemented a sugar tax to address obesity and obesity-related health issues, but studies so far have shown the tax’s effectiveness to be disappointing.
Detractors say such taxes have not led to a significant reduction in the consumption of sugary drinks, and when they have, consumers have turned to other high-calorie sources.
It is also a regressive tax, affecting lower-income far more than higher-income households, while increased costs incurred to companies are either passed on to the consumer or offset through job cuts.
Health Promotion Administration Director-General Wang Ying-wei (王英偉) in May last year said that the government had discussed a sugar tax, but concluded that the issue should be left to market forces, and that Taiwan’s love affair with takeout beverages would make a sugar tax difficult to regulate.
Even if the tax is not effective, the reasoning behind it is laudable. Ministry of Education data shows that about 30 percent of elementary and junior-high school students are obese. Obesity rates in Taiwan are Asia’s highest, second only to China.
In her inaugural address last week Tsai said that the government would target long-term healthcare and research on communicable diseases, such as coronaviruses, obesity has been linked to noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes, certain cancers and cardiovascular diseases. These place a huge burden on the healthcare system.
Governments have had two major priorities during the pandemic: Keep deaths to a minimum and avoid overwhelming national healthcare systems. Much has been made of “flattening the curve” and reducing the peak of patients needing care at any one time.
The same can be said for the imminent bankruptcy of the NHI system: The sooner it is addressed, the less painful averting the crisis will be. Officials in Taiwan should have learned this lesson by now.
If there ever was a time for the public to fully appreciate the healthcare system and accept an increase in premiums, it is now. If, as Chen said, raising the NHI premium is not on the government’s list of priorities right now, perhaps it should be.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS