Netflix on April 21 announced that it had gained 15.8 million subscribers in the first quarter of the year, almost double what market analysts had expected, largely due to the number of people staying home because of lockdowns or stay-at-home advisories to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
While that was good news for the world’s largest streaming service, it might not be for Formosa Plastics Corp (FPC), one of the four major subsidiaries of Formosa Plastics Group (FPG), which on April 10 posted a combined loss of NT$13.99 billion (US$469.43 million) for the quarter, its worst performance in five years. That is because on March 11, the second season of Netflix’s critically acclaimed investigative series about greed, crime and corporate corruption, Dirty Money, premiered worldwide, with six episodes that examine everything from Wells Fargo’s predatory business practices and fraud to Malaysia’s 1MDB scandal to Formosa Plastics’ damaging environmental practices at its massive plant in Point Comfort, Texas.
As a result of its actions at Point Comfort, FPG in October last year agreed to pay a US$50 million settlement to end a lawsuit over its discharge of plastic pellet waste and polyvinyl chloride powder into Lavaca Bay and other waterways near the Gulf of Mexico.
The settlement, which US District Judge Kenneth Hoyt approved on Dec. 3 and signed two days later, made headlines in Taiwan, the US and elsewhere when it was announced, not only because it was the largest financial settlement in a lawsuit brought by private individuals under the US Clean Water Act, but because FPG agreed to a zero-discharge agreement, something the plastics industry has long argued was impossible.
Hoyt and FPG made headlines the previous June when, in ruling in favor of the plaintiffs in that lawsuit, he called FPC a “serial offender” that had committed “enormous” infringements of the Clean Water Act and Texas state law since 2016.
The Dirty Money episode, Point Comfort, demonstrates that Hoyt’s comments were well deserved, for it is not just about malfeasance by FPG at the Texas plant.
Margaret Brown, who directed the episode, incorporated archive footage of protests against FPG in Taiwan, including those in November 1987 over pollution from its plant in what was then Kaohsiung County’s Renwu Township (仁武), as well as other protests in March 1993 and April 1999.
FPG’s poor track record is well known to Taiwanese. In 2009, the Environmental Protection Administration found that the soil and groundwater at the Renwu plant contained chemical compounds exceeding the agency’s standards, including 1,2-dichloroethane — which is believed to be a carcinogen — at 30,000 times higher than standards allowed.
However, Brown’s episode brings FPG’s story to homes around the world, showcasing the dichotomy between the company’s public relations efforts and the reality on the ground. It details the efforts of whistle-blowers and community activists such as Diane Wilson, a former commercial shrimper who waged a decades-long battle against FPG after she saw her industry destroyed by pollution from the Point Comfort plant. It also shows how easy it was for FPG to evade oversight from Texas regulators, as well as how the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Environmental Protection Agency are failing consumers and endangering their health, which are points that no doubt sound familiar to viewers in many nations outside Taiwan and the US.
The episode, which was produced before Hoyt finalized the settlement, leaves out an interesting part of the agreement: If Formosa issues any press release or statement about donations made or projects funded with the settlement, it must state that it has done so as a result of the lawsuit, not as part of corporate goodwill or largesse.
Point Comfort shows that in the end, there are some things that money just cannot buy.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and