The Taichung Police Department on Tuesday said it would recall traffic safety posters found to contain the image of a Chinese police officer. The department said it would reprimand those responsible for the mistake and form an oversight committee for public announcement materials, but the real issue is that posters are a lazy and ineffective way to address road safety.
The department said it spent NT$5,300 on 5,000 posters — not an exorbitant sum — but why waste money on materials the public is likely to ignore, and that could end up harming the city’s image? Even if each poster had a positive effect on the driving habits of passersby, this would not have a significant impact on road safety in a city populated by millions.
Last week, the Kaohsiung Police Department was similarly criticized for distributing 18,000 road safety pamphlets over the Lunar New Year holiday that showed China’s national flag. A pamphlet, which the public is likely to discard without reading, is arguably even less effective than a poster.
These departments should take a cue from the Taipei Department of Transportation, which worked with the Ministry of Transportation and Communications to set up a road safety park for children and developed a road safety curriculum for elementary schools.
A road safety curriculum is especially important. Many countries have younger students learn about road safety in the classroom. Since 1986, the New South Wales Centre for Road Safety in Australia has provided materials and training on road safety for school children. The lower grades learn about pedestrian and passenger safety, while the upper grades learn about driver safety. The Brussels-based European Transport Safety Council provides all levels of EU schools with road safety education in compliance with the UN Convention on Road Traffic. While not all European countries provide the same content, most address road safety rules, traffic signs and pedestrian safety, as well as driving safety for the upper grades. Most school districts in the US and Canada provide road safety education in elementary schools, while many high schools in both countries offer optional driver education courses.
A study by the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the US National Library of Medicine found that the families of kindergarteners and elementary-school students who underwent a 10-week road safety course practiced safer driving, such as always wearing a seat belt in vehicles.
However, road safety programs in elementary schools are not a magic bullet. In rural areas of Taiwan, in particular, up to 40 percent of those involved in fatal traffic accidents are elderly motorists, ministry statistics from October last year showed.
Many fatal accidents involve dangerous habits, such as driving while texting or driving under the influence.
Although children who learn about road safety at school might influence some adults to adopt good driving habits, other adults might not change, or might not be around children with this type of education.
Driver safety campaigns on a large scale — such as public announcements on television and radio, and greater police presence on busy roadways — might help, but this must be accompanied by stricter enforcement. Drivers who think that there are no consequences for unsafe driving are less likely to change bad habits.
Road safety is a serious issue that must be addressed. Police departments that want to tackle it must commit themselves to stricter enforcement, while also working with schools to help educate children in the classroom.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor