If a grown man approaches an eight-year-old girl in a store and forcefully licks her feet, does that constitute sexual harassment?
The question should be obvious. The issue is that law enforcement in this day and age is even debating what constitutes sexual harassment.
As open and advanced as Taiwan is, it often feels that some parts of it remain in a time warp.
Two topics have been the subject of judicial debate lately — the toe-licker and online gambling.
Online gambling is indeed murky, as Taiwan’s laws only prohibit gambling in public places, and it is worth debating whether people should be punished for gambling from their homes on a Web site that is not hosted in Taiwan.
However, the debate over sexual harassment is ludicrous — judges should make the call instead of reverting to their wishy-washy “dinosaur” habits of protecting the perpetrators.
The accused in the toe-licking case committed a similar crime in 2016 and was charged with sexual harassment — but was given a 40-day sentence commutable to a NT$40,000 fine. This kind of slap on the wrist will not stop anybody, but that is for a different debate.
In any case, he allegedly did it again on Sunday, and while he was arrested on sexual harassment charges, not only was he released without bail, the prosecutors said there was “room for debate” whether his behavior constituted sexual harassment.
This is a repeat offender and the victim is a minor, and yet again law enforcement tries to make excuses for the suspect.
It is really hard to understand why the judicial system is so lenient toward such vile behavior.
The girl went through quite an ordeal, spending four hours being questioned by police, having to repeatedly recount the experience — while the suspect kept spouting complete nonsense, such as that he saw something dirty on her foot and wanted to clean it off.
According to the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act (性騷擾防治法), the offending action should exhibit “sexual behavior violating another person’s wishes.”
According to a report by the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times), the prosecutors are not sure licking someone’s toes constitutes sexual behavior.
What world does these prosecutors live in that they have never heard of a foot fetish, one of the most common sexual fetishes in the world, in which licking is one of the most common ways to express it?
In the 2016 incident, as well as Sunday’s, a young girl was targeted. That is pedophilia. That this even has to be explained shows the ridiculousness of it all.
The bright side is that the judge agreed that it was sexual harassment, saying that toe-licking is a sexual act for certain people and the suspect’s behavior constituted improper contact that clearly made the victim feel uncomfortable or disgusted.
How this case and other sexual harassment cases play out should be closely watched.
Victims in Taiwan are already often reluctant to report such cases due to a number of societal factors, and would be even less likely to press charges if the suspect gets away again with just a fine or is not even charged with sexual harassment.
Laws should be consistent. If the suspect was charged in the 2016 case for the same act, it cannot be up for debate now.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
RSS