The US case against the chief financial officer of China’s Huawei Technologies (華為), who was arrested in Canada last month, centers on the company’s suspected ties to two obscure companies. One is a telecom equipment seller that operated in Tehran; the other is that firm’s owner, a holding company registered in Mauritius.
US authorities allege that Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟) deceived international banks into clearing transactions with Iran by claiming that the two companies were independent of Huawei, when in fact Huawei controlled them.
Huawei has maintained that the two are independent: equipment seller Skycom Tech Co Ltd (星通技術) and shell company Canicula Holdings Ltd.
Illustration: Lance Liu
However, corporate filings and other documents found in Iran and Syria show that Huawei, the world’s largest supplier of telecommunications network equipment, is more closely linked to both firms than previously known.
The documents reveal that a high-level Huawei executive appears to have been appointed Skycom’s Iran manager. They also show that at least three Chinese-named individuals had signing rights for both Huawei and Skycom bank accounts in Iran.
Reporters also discovered that a Middle Eastern lawyer said that Huawei conducted operations in Syria through Canicula.
The previously unreported ties between Huawei and the two companies could bear on the US case against Meng, who is the daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei (任正非), by further undermining Huawei’s claims that Skycom was merely an arms-length business partner.
Huawei, US authorities assert, retained control of Skycom, using it to sell telecom equipment to Iran and move money out via the international banking system.
As a result of the deception, US authorities say, banks unwittingly cleared hundreds of millions of dollars of transactions that potentially violated economic sanctions Washington had in place at the time against doing business with Iran.
Meng did not respond to a request for comment and Huawei declined to answer questions for this story.
Canicula’s offices could not be reached.
A US Department of Justice spokesman in Washington declined to comment.
Meng was released on C$10 million (US$7.5 million) bail on Dec. 11 and remains in Vancouver while Washington tries to extradite her.
In the US, Meng would face charges in connection with an alleged conspiracy to defraud multiple financial institutions, with a maximum sentence of 30 years for each charge. The exact charges have not been made public.
Huawei last month said it has been given little information about the US allegations “and is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms Meng.”
The company has described its relationship with Skycom as “a normal business partnership.”
It has said it has fully complied with all laws and regulations, and required Skycom to do the same.
Meng’s arrest on a US warrant has caused an uproar in China. It came at a time of growing trade and military tensions between Washington and Beijing, and amid worries by US intelligence that Huawei’s telecommunications equipment could contain “backdoors” for Chinese espionage.
The firm has repeatedly denied such claims.
Nevertheless, New Zealand and Australia recently banned Huawei from building their next generation of mobile phone networks, and British authorities have also expressed concerns.
Articles published by Reuters in 2012 and 2013 about Huawei, Skycom and Meng figure prominently in the US case against her.
Reuters reported that Skycom had offered to sell at least 1.3 million euros (US$1.5 million) worth of embargoed Hewlett-Packard computer equipment to Iran’s largest mobile-phone operator in 2010. At least 13 pages of the proposal were marked “Huawei confidential” and carried Huawei’s logo.
Huawei has said neither it nor Skycom ultimately provided the US equipment.
Reuters also reported numerous financial and personnel links between Huawei and Skycom, including that Meng had served on Skycom’s board of directors between February 2008 and April 2009.
Several banks questioned Huawei about the articles, according to court documents filed by Canadian authorities at the request of the US for Meng’s bail hearing in Vancouver last month.
According to the documents, US investigators allege that in responding to the banks, which were not named, Meng and other Huawei employees “repeatedly lied” about the company’s relationship with Skycom and failed to disclose that “Skycom was entirely controlled by Huawei.”
US authorities also allege that at a private meeting with a bank executive, in or about August 2013, Meng said that Huawei had sold its shares in Skycom, but did not disclose that the buyer was “a company also controlled by Huawei.”
The court documents allege that Huawei told the executive’s bank that the Chinese company had sold its shares in Skycom in 2009 — the same year Meng stepped down from Skycom’s board.
Skycom’s buyer was not identified in the documents.
However, Skycom records filed in Hong Kong, where the company was registered, show that its shares were transferred in November 2007 to Canicula.
Canicula, which was registered in Mauritius in 2006, continued to hold Skycom shares for about a decade, Skycom records show.
A “Summary of Facts” filed by US authorities for Meng’s Canadian bail hearing states: “Documents and e-mail records show that persons listed as ‘managing directors’ for Skycom were Huawei employees.”
None of those individuals were named.
A company record filed by Skycom in Iran that was entered in the Iranian registry in December 2011 states that a “Shi Yaohong” had been elected as manager of Skycom’s Iran branch for two years. Huawei employs an executive named Shi Yaohong (史耀宏).
According to his LinkedIn profile, Shi was named Huawei’s “president Middle East region” in June 2012.
An Emirates news agency press release identified him in November 2010 as “president of Huawei Etisalat key account.”
Etisalat is a major Middle Eastern telecommunications group and a Huawei partner.
Shi, now president of Huawei’s software business unit, hung up the phone when reporters asked him about his relationship with Skycom.
Many corporate records filed by Skycom in Iran list signatories for its bank accounts in the country. Most of the names are Chinese; at least three of the individuals had signing rights for both Skycom and Huawei bank accounts (One of the names is listed in the Iranian registry with two slightly different spellings, but has the same passport number).
US authorities allege in the court documents filed in Canada that Huawei employees were signatories on Skycom bank accounts between 2007 and 2013.
Records in Hong Kong show that Skycom was voluntarily liquidated in June 2017 and that Canicula was paid about US$132,000 as part of the resolution.
The liquidator, Chan Leung Lee, of BDO Ltd in Hong Kong, declined to comment.
The Financial Services Commission in Mauritius, where Canicula remains registered, declined to release any of its records to reporters, saying they were confidential.
Until two years ago, Canicula had an office in Syria, another country that has been subject to US and EU sanctions. In May 2014, a Middle Eastern business Web site called Aliqtisadi.com published a brief article about the dissolution of a Huawei company in Syria that specialized in ATM equipment.
Osama Karawani, an attorney who was identified as the appointed liquidator, wrote a letter asking for a correction, stating that the article had caused “serious damage” to Huawei.
Karawani said the article suggested that Huawei itself had been dissolved, not just the ATM company. In his letter, which was linked to on the Aliqtisadi Web site, he said that Huawei was still in business.
“Huawei was never dissolved,” he wrote, adding that it “has been and is still operating in Syria through several companies which are Huawei Technologies Ltd and Canicula Holdings Ltd.”
Huawei Technologies is one of Huawei’s main operating companies.
Karawani did not respond to e-mailed questions about Canicula.
US investigators are aware of Canicula’s connection to Syria, a person familiar with the probe said.
Canicula had an office in Damascus and operated in Syria on behalf of Huawei, another person said.
That person said Canicula’s customers there included three major telecommunications companies.
One is MTN Syria, controlled by South Africa’s MTN Group Ltd, which has mobile-phone operations in Syria and Iran. MTN has a joint venture in Iran — MTN Irancell — that is also a Huawei customer.
MTN advised Huawei on setting up the structure of Skycom’s office in Iran, another source familiar with the matter said.
“Skycom was just a front” for Huawei, the person said.
An official with MTN said no one at the company was available to comment.
In December 2017, a notice was placed in a Syrian newspaper by “the general director of the branch of the company Canicula Ltd.” He was not named. It announced that Canicula had “totally stopped operating” in Syria two months before. No explanation was given.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US