More than 70 aging women live in a squalid neighborhood between the rear gate of the US Army garrison, and half a dozen seedy nightclubs in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. Near the front gate, glossy illustrations posted in real-estate offices show the dream homes that might one day replace their one-room shacks.
They once worked as prostitutes for US soldiers in this “camptown” near Camp Humphreys, and they have stayed because they have nowhere else to go. Now, the women are being forced out of the Anjeong-ri neighborhood by developers and landlords eager to build on prime real estate around the soon-to-be-expanded garrison.
“My landlord wants me to leave, but my legs hurt, I can’t walk and South Korean real estate is too expensive,” says Cho Myung-ja, 75, a former prostitute who receives monthly court eviction notices at her home, which she has rarely left over the past five years because of leg pain.
Illustration: Mountain People
“I feel like I’m suffocating,” she says.
Plagued by disease, poverty and stigma, the women have little to no support from the public or the South Korean government.
Their fate contrasts greatly with a group of South Korean women forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops during World War II. Those so-called “comfort women” receive government assistance under a special law, and large crowds demanding that Japan compensate and apologize to the women attend weekly rallies outside the Japanese embassy.
While the camptown women receive social welfare, there is no similar law for special funds to help them, according to two Pyeongtaek city officials who refused to be named because of office rules.
Many people in South Korea do not even know about the camptown women.
In the decades following the devastation of the 1950-1953 Korean War, South Korea was a poor dictatorship deeply dependent on the US military.
Analysts say the South Korean government saw the women as necessary for the thousands of US soldiers stationed in the South.
Some of the women went to the camps voluntarily; others were brought by pimps.
In 1962, the government formalized the camptowns as “special tourism districts” with legalized prostitution. That year, about 20,000 registered prostitutes worked in nearly 100 camptowns, and many more were unregistered.
The women who became prostitutes saw few other options, but the work made them social pariahs, unable to live or work anywhere else, says Park Kyung-soo, secretary general of the National Campaign for the Eradication of Crimes against Korean Civilians, a group that tries to uncover and monitor alleged US military crimes against South Koreans.
Pockets of former camptown women exist throughout South Korea. Now in their 60s, 70s and 80s, the women of Anjeong-ri mostly live alone in tiny homes, struggling to pay for food and rent on a monthly government stipend of between 300,000 and 400,000 won (US$300 and US$400).
Activists say most of the women are in danger of losing their homes.
“I’m so worried that I can’t sleep,” says a camptown woman who will only give her surname, Kim, because she is ashamed of her past.
The 75-year-old’s landlords have told her she has a month to leave, and she looks nearly every day for a new home.
The camptown women’s predicament began when Washington and Seoul agreed in 2004 to relocate the sprawling Yongsan US base, which takes up 251 hectares of prime real estate in the center of wealthy Seoul, to the base in Pyeongtaek, 70km from the capital. The deadline, originally set for 2012, is now tentatively 2016.
At the end of the move, Camp Humphreys will have tripled in size and house more than 36,000 people, including troops, their family members and civilian staff. Investors are eyeing the Pyeongtaek land in anticipation of homes for US military families and sites for businesses that will cater to the new flood of people and wealth.
Piles of rubble from demolished homes sit next to new villas. A few blocks from some of the remaining shacks, a partially built apartment building rises to the beating of hammers and whirring of drills.
Landlords eager to capitalize on rising land prices are trying to force the women out with pressure and eviction orders, and have more than quadrupled the monthly rent, from 50,000 won to 200,000 won, said Woo Soon-duk, director of the Sunlit Sisters’ Center, a local non-governmental organization dedicated to the women.
Many of the women want the government to take greater responsibility for their well-being and financial stability. They believe they played an important role for South Korea.
In June, 122 former camptown prostitutes sued the South Korean government. They are each seeking 10 million won in compensation. A court date has not been set.
Activists and lawyers for the women say police prevented prostitutes from leaving; that the government forced the women to undergo tests for sexually transmitted diseases, then locked them up if they were sick; and that officials from the US military and South Korean government regularly inspected the prostitution operations.
The government saw the camptowns as a way to regulate prostitution, bring in much-needed money and keep the US soldiers happy.
It was also worried about a rising number of sex crimes committed against South Korean women by US soldiers in the 1950s and 1960s, Park says.
A spokeswoman for the South Korean Ministry of Gender Equality and Family declined to comment until after a court reaches a decision.
She would not give her name, saying office rules prohibited her from being named publicly.
The US military would not answer specific questions about the women, saying in a statement that it was aware of their case and has “zero tolerance” for prostitution.
Many of the women feel trapped.
As Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers’ Rebels plays on an old radio, Kim Soon-hee, 65, a former camptown prostitute, eats a piece of melon. Clotheslines crisscross her room, which barely fits a bed and a dresser. The air smells strongly of the mold that covers the walls.
She wants to move to a better place in the same neighborhood, but she is too poor.
“In the winter, the water doesn’t flow because the pipes are frozen,” she says.
She shares a courtyard with two other one-bedroom homes, which are empty.
Jang Young-mi, 67, who was orphaned as a girl and worked in a military camptown for nearly two decades, lives with three mangy dogs. A bite from one of them left the long white scar on her hand, but she refuses to abandon the offending animal.
“Maybe because I lived for so long with American soldiers, I can’t fit in with Koreans,” Jang says. “Why did my life have to turn out this way?”
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS