Chinese Catholics pack Beijing’s Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception for Sunday Mass, praying and singing hymns beneath stained glass windows much like their brethren around the world.
However, the spirituality on display masks a complicated tangle encompassing the Vatican and clergy loyal to it on the one hand, and the officially approved church in China, which does not recognize the authority of the Holy See.
The surprise retirement of Pope Benedict XVI and anticipation over his successor have brought back into focus conflict between a 2,000-year-old organization that claims universal reach and China’s Communist rulers.
Outside the state-sanctioned cathedral one worshiper epitomized the contradiction, pulling out a keyring carrying an image of John Paul II and said that all Chinese Catholics support the popes.
Experts estimate that there are as many as 12 million Catholics in China, with about half in congregations under the officially administered Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association.
The rest belong to non-sanctioned or so-called underground churches, though despite the name many operate in the open, with experts saying levels of acceptance depend on local officials’ attitudes.
The key point of contention is the approval of bishops, where the Vatican insists its authority is absolute.
In July last year, the state-run church ordained a bishop in the northeastern city of Harbin in defiance of the Holy See, which subsequently excommunicated him. Chinese authorities dismissed the Vatican’s protests as “rude and unreasonable.”
In a dramatic display of defiance in the same month, Thaddeus Ma Daqin (馬達欽) denounced the official church at his own ordination ceremony as its auxiliary bishop of Shanghai, and has reportedly been under house arrest ever since.
“What we desire is a wonderful relation between the Holy See and China, and the unity of the church in China, but in this mood they are making it impossible,” Cardinal Joseph Zen ( 陳日君), former leader of Hong Kong’s Roman Catholics, told reporters.
During his tenure, Benedict sought a measure of accommodation, assuring Beijing that the Vatican had no intention of undermining its rule and offering encouragement to Catholics in official congregations.
The Catholic Church in China “does not have a mission to change the structure or administration of the state,” he made clear in a 2007 letter to Chinese Catholics.
However, he drew a line at any governmental interference in the Vatican’s right to manage ecclesiastical affairs and insisted that all lay Catholics were members of a single global church — a challenge to Beijing’s self-declared powers.
“The solution to existing problems cannot be pursued via an ongoing conflict with the legitimate civil authorities,” Benedict wrote. “At the same time, though, compliance with those authorities is not acceptable when they interfere unduly in matters regarding the faith and discipline of the church.”
The Chinese Communist Party is officially atheist and heavily persecuted religious believers in its early decades in power. It doggedly guards its dominance of public life and remains deeply suspicious of any possible foreign political influence.
It is a difference as intractable as a theological schism, but despite the tensions, popes are not vilified by China’s government and state media, unlike the Dalai Lama of Tibetan Buddhism, who is depicted as a threat to the nation.
Nonetheless, after Benedict’s surprise resignation announcement, China said improved relations were only possible if the Vatican took “a flexible and practical attitude,” switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to Beijing and, crucially, minded its own business.
“The Vatican should not interfere in China’s internal affairs, including interferences in the name of religious affairs,” foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) said.
The underground Church says it will stand firm on its principles under the new pope, while building on dialogue with the Chinese government.
“We will still say what we need to say and we will still do what we need to do,” an underground priest said in an e-mail to reporters delivered via the Justice and Peace Commission of the Hong Kong Catholic Diocese.
If the church allowed political considerations to override its theological mission “our loss will be very, very great,” he said, speaking anonymously because of concern for his safety.
The dispute leaves the country’s Catholics — a minority among the estimated 67 million Christians of all denominations — feeling vulnerable.
“China’s Catholics remain nervous that their situation could change at any time,” said Anthony Clark, an expert on the faith in the country, who teaches Chinese history at Whitworth University, a Christian institution in the US.
“Recent months have seen a tight government crackdown on underground Protestant churches ... and Catholics worry that more state interference might be coming their way too,” Clark added.
In Shanghai, visitors to the hillside pilgrimage site of Sheshan Basilica had divided views on prospects under Benedict’s successor.
“Everything is possible,” said Marco Ju, who converted to the faith four years ago.
However, a priest in the state-sanctioned church, who identified himself as Father Fang, said he doubted the new pope could normalize relations.
“This target will never be achieved,” he said. “The church will not give up its independence.”
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
Former Hong Kong media magnate Jimmy Lai (黎智英), who on Monday was sentenced to 20 years in jail for his role in the 2019 Hong Kong democracy movement and “colluding with foreign forces,” once called on members of the US government for support in his struggle against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Speaking to a forum at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in July 2019, Lai, speaking about the US having the moral authority over the CCP, said: “It’s like they are going to battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in
RSS