The disqualification of Taiwanese taekwondo contestant Yang Shu-chun (楊淑君) at the Asian Games in Guangzhou, China, has provoked an uproar from all quarters. As Asia Games officials and the Taiwanese side each insist on their own version of the story and cross-strait conspiracy theories run rampant, it is very difficult to work out what actually happened and where the blame lies.
While angry people in Taiwan are unanimously taking aim at external factors, I have to ask what, if anything, the Sports Affairs Council and the Taiwanese delegation to the Asia Games did to prepare for such a foreseeable event as Yang’s unfair disqualification.
This is by no means the first time that South Korean referees have made controversial judgments at sporting events. This is especially true of taekwondo, a sport in which South Korea holds a dominant position. The controversy over the knockout of Taiwanese contestant Tseng Ching-hsiang (曾敬翔) at the East Asian Games in Hong Kong last December is just one example.
Another factor we should have been aware of is China’s consistent effort to suppress our country’s athletes at sporting events. There have been plenty of examples, never mind the fact that this time China was the host country.
Given that these unfavorable factors were already well known, and that an unfortunate incident at the Asian Games was therefore quite predictable, I feel it was essential to take thorough precautions before the games got underway. So what did the sports council and our Asian Games delegation actually do in this regard?
I am curious to know why there was no controversy about the protective gear worn by Taiwanese gold medal winner Huang Hsien-yung (黃顯詠), while Yang’s gear got her into this ridiculous situation. Clearly these two contestants were wearing different kinds of foot gear. However, why would two athletes from the same delegation be wearing different kinds of protective gear?
The team coaches said after the incident that Yang was equipped in accordance with the rulebook and that her foot guards had been approved when officials inspected them before the match. Of course, Asian Games officials deny this and the officials who inspected Yang’s equipment are nowhere to be found.
However, we still have to ask what the sports council did to help the coaches and competitors with matters such as translation, assistance in changing protective gear and ensuring that there would be no hitches when the equipment was inspected.
It was pretty clear that Yang was going to come up against the host country’s top competitor, Wu Jingyu (吳靜鈺), who is considered Yang’s archrival, in the finals. Surely the sports council should have foreseen that there might be some kind of political interference and taken the utmost care to help the coach and competitor deal with anything that might come up. Given their failure to do so, one can only conclude that the sports council and delegation officials are extremely naive.
Lin Hsuan-chu is an assistant professor at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS