Carrying the Olympic flame to the summit of Mount Everest live on TV is, even by Chinese standards, a demanding challenge.
Last week mountaineering authorities in Lhasa announced they wanted to limit the number of foreign climbers on the Tibetan side of the 8,850m peak next spring to allow a trial run to assess the technology and manpower needed to start the Beijing Olympics from the summit of the world.
But the propaganda value has been severely compromised by video footage taken by a Western mountaineer of a 17-year-old Tibetan nun being shot in the back by Chinese border guards trying to stop a group of 73 refugees crossing the Nangpa La, a 5,800m pass, about 24km west of Everest, to Nepal.
The nun was Kelsang Namtso from Nagchu Prefecture, the only daughter in a family of six. Like many Tibetans, she had no access to education and planned to study at the Dolma Ling nunnery in India. Travelling with her childhood friend, Dolma Palkyi, she endured high winds and deep snow. The two young women ran out of food as they approached the difficult pass.
The trail to the Nangpa La pass is overlooked by the base camp of the 8,200m mountain Cho Oyu, often used as a training peak by climbers gaining experience for an attempt on Everest. Footage of People's Armed Police (PAP) taking aim at refugees and of bodies hitting the snow was taken by Romanian mountaineer Sergiu Matei and broadcast around the world.
A death has been reported by the state-run Xinhua news agency, but it did not name the victim and claimed PAP opened fire in self-defense.
Mary Beth Markey of the International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) said: "We don't know if the targeting of this group was an isolated incident by Chinese border police or represents hardline protocols."
The appointment of hardliner Zhang Qingli (張慶黎) as party secretary of the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) in May has signalled a renewed determination by Beijing to cement the region to China. Chinese migration into Tibet has accelerated with the opening of the new high-altitude railway to Lhasa.
Restrictions on religious freedoms in the TAR have been tightened in what Zhang called a "fight to the death struggle" against the Dalai Lama in a speech in May.
Patriotic re-education in nunneries and monasteries has driven more nuns and monks to face the dangers of the Nangpa La to escape Tibet.
Most refugees travel in autumn and winter when deep snow reduces the chance of meeting border patrols, but conditions are severe.
Palkyi, 16, claimed she had paid US$700 to smugglers who guide groups over the Himalaya mountains. Western tourists attempting to climb Cho Oyu frequently encounter refugees and there have been several reports of violence in recent years.
ICT director John Ackerly, himself a mountaineer, says climbers should be bolder in criticizing human rights abuses.
"You can compare it to our responsibility to help an injured fellow climber on the mountain," he said. "It's a basic human concern for another individual. Obviously there are choices and things you need to balance. It's not an easy decision all the time, but sometimes, as in this instance, it's no skin off anyone's back to speak out. People think that China holds a much more rigorous list than they do."
Changes in regulations on Everest are also being seen as a response to criticism in the spring that the low cost of climbing the mountain from Tibet caused accidents, including the death of British mountaineer David Sharp in May. Although reports that fellow climbers ignored the dying Sharp proved false, mountain guides say independent climbers operating on a shoestring are relying too heavily on the resources of others.
So China is making it more expensive to climb Everest, as well as limiting numbers during the runup to the Olympics. It will also require climbers going to Everest to have previous experience of climbing another mountain of more than 8,000m.
So far, China has not changed its comparatively light regulation on communications equipment such as satellite phones. That may change. With the Olympics drawing closer, China may decide it doesn't need more negative publicity from incidents such as the death of a young nun.
Ed Douglas is a mountaineer and writer on climbing.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS