On Wednesday, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) indicated that before any ministry or department issued any major decision in response to the current SARS epidemic, thorough discussions and considerations must be made. Bluntly put -- think before you talk.
Unfortunately, way too little thinking is being done these days before announcements are often impulsively made, creating the need to hastily modify or retract altogether the announcement just made.
The most glaring example is the controversy surrounding the Ministry of Education's (MOE) decision to change the test format of the upcoming joint college-entrance examination. The process through which the ministry finally made up its mind is like a winding uphill road with many twists and turns.
On May 22, Minister of Education Huang Jong-tsun (黃榮村) abruptly announced that, to prevent the further spread of SARS, all the test questions would be in multiple-choice format. Just the next day, Huang changed his mind and declared that the essay format would still be used for two test subjects -- Chinese, and English. Reportedly, the change came after a phone call from Premier Yu Shyi-kun. Even as of Wednesday morning, Huang was still saying that if there was going to be further changes, the Joint College-Examination Center would make the announcement before 5pm today.
It isn't that the MOE cannot or should not make the change. But it has to think over carefully and weigh all the upsides and downsides first. If indeed there was a need for the change, then it must stand by its decision, rather than caving in to public pressure. The ministry usually announces the scope of the test in the previous fall, so by May and June students will have already intensively prepared and studied for the examination -- in the format announced -- for at least six months. Any change in the test format is therefore likely to impact their performance. Under the circumstances, protests were entirely foreseeable.
Moreover, as the public watches the drama of the on-again and off-again change to the test format, they must wonder by whom and how is any decision reached regarding the examination? Was it the MOE? If so, then how was it possible for the premier to overturn the decision with a single phone call? Huang claimed the Joint College Enrollment Committee was the one calling the shots. But how believable is that claim? No one person should be able to call the shots with any government decisions. There should be a legally established decision-making mechanism participated in by individuals or government bodies with legally delegated authority to do so. While the operation of the mechanism should by all means be transparent, so as to enable media and public supervision and monitoring, once a decision is thereby made, it should also be final. Any public feedback or opinion should only be considered within the framework of the mechanism.
Finally, it is also very frustrating to see measures announced in such a piecemeal fashion. On Wednesday, the MOE also indicated that if, by June 1, more than 1 percent of the test-takers were under quarantine, then the examination would be postponed. The new test date will be announced by June 20. This adds an even greater element of uncertainty to this year's college-entrance examination. Had the MOE announced all the various measures together in a coherent fashion, the public panic and resentment could have been significantly reduced.
The government is working hard to deal with all the problems related to the SARS epidemic. Unfortunately, there are systemic problems with the ways things are handled and decisions are made. The controversy surrounding the MOE is just one such example. Others include the mess over extending the deadline for filing income tax returns and canceling the no leave order for military personnel. If these problems are not dealt with properly, all the hard work will have been in vain.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS