The 34th Baseball World Cup proved to be a wonderful elixir for the people of Taiwan. It was more fun than the wedding of the first daughter, the craze for McDonald's Hello Kitty dolls or even the hatching of a penguin egg at the Mucha Zoo. It also inspired a long-lost sense of pride about belonging to this country and this land.
Against this backdrop of heighten national feelings, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
There is nothing really new about the idea of such an arena. It was first raised after the old "Egg" dome on Nanjing E. Road caught fire, because of the ill-advised lighting of firecrackers inside the building. The idea was raised again when the baseball stadium on Tun Hwa N. Road was demolished. But the euphoria over the baseball tournament and Taiwan's bronze medal should not overwhelm the reality that major sporting events in Taiwan -- whether domestic or international -- are the exception rather than the rule. There are few compelling reasons for a domed stadium and a lot of reasons, mostly financial, against.
Proponents say such a project would help encourage a sports culture in Taiwan. A noble goal, for physical and mental health reasons and for economic ones. But a goal that is unlikely to be realized.
Despite the enthusiasm heard whenever Taiwan's teams appear in international competitions, a lasting sports culture is unlikely to take root -- as evidenced by the difficulty in sustaining professional basketball and baseball leagues. To have a sports culture, people have to be interested in sports and play them on regular basis. To reach international standards or a professional level, athletes must receive adequate training and support from an early age.
For both cultural and economic reasons, Taiwan's educational system has emphasized getting into good schools and getting high degrees. Even if students wanted to take time out from their studies to play organized sports -- and their parents were willing to allow them -- they have few opportunities. In Taipei City, for example, there are just four junior high schools and four primary schools that have baseball teams.
In addition, Taiwan's professional athletes find it hard to make a living. There are two professional baseball leagues, each with four teams, even though the population base can really only support one league. Many of Taiwan's top players have ended up playing in the Japanese leagues. Basketball players fare little better. The only ones who really make money off of sports in Taiwan are those who gamble.
Proponents of the dome also argue that such a venue would come in handy when hosting international sports competitions, Taiwan rarely ever gets the chance to do so. This is one reason that the Baseball World Cup meant so much to the people of Taiwan.
Another reason the tournament was popular, at least among officials and accountants, was that it was financially rewarding. According to the Chinese-language media, the tournament infused an estimated NT$300 million into the economy. Tickets accounted for more than NT$40 million, while the licensing fees collected from local and foreign broadcast rights brought in another NT$45 million. Then there were all the souvenirs bought by fans, commercial airtime sold by broadcasters and so on.
But given the paucity of both international and major domestic sporting events that require a large domed stadium, the only way such an arena could make money is by being rented out for campaign rallies or concerts. Hardly the patriotic raison d'etre the dome's champions are talking about. Is it fair to ask Taipei residents or the national government to pick up the bill for such a project? Not in these economic times.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS