China's Vice President Hu Jintao (
Looking at China's political scene, Hu undoubtedly stands at the forefront among those in a position to become a fourth-generation leader. But as Western China-watchers have noted, although China has rules governing the process of succession, non-institutional power relationships are frequently more important than any precedents.
This being the case, while Hu has long been seen as a popular choice, at what point will President Jiang Zemin (
China has always relied on a traditional model when it comes to succession. The current leader elevates several possible candidates and carefully observes their performance while examining how well they are received by other party elders.
Only after a period of transition will the final candidate appear on stage, but what is worth noting is that those who stand aside for the new leader don't necessarily lose their power. They continue to occupy certain posts and are still able to exert influence.
Therefore, the relationship between Jiang and Hu may operate along the lines of this old model, with Jiang set to announce his resignation from the position of general secretary of the Communist Party at the party's 16th national congress next fall, at the same time announcing Hu's succession.
Nevertheless, China's three key political figures today -- Jiang , Premier Zhu Rongji (
Actually, in light of the fact that China is facing yet another crucial moment, the heavyweights are all the less likely to give up their political influence. The "crucial moment" involves China's preparations to use its geographical advantages to bargain with the US as part of the global anti-terrorist movement in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the US. Possible bargaining points include US arms sales to Taiwan and restrictions on US arms sales to China.
In addition, after China enters the WTO, how will the problem of increasing numbers of workers laid off from state-run enterprises be solved? Will China's poor farmers, who number more than the entire US population, become a new social problem? Finally, how can a smooth advance of preparations for the 2008 Olympic Games be ensured?
All of these issues will be impossible for a new successor to confront independently before securing the foundations of his power. The political influence of the three political heavyweights, therefore, can only be expected to increase in the near future.
Supposing that Hu does smoothly succeed Jiang, there is still another question as to what other influences will be brought to bear on Chinese politics. According to China's unwritten rules of political succession, members of the Politburo must be under 70. Those who should resign at the same time as Jiang, then, include two-thirds of the the body's current members. The process of succession, therefore, will create space for a younger group of leaders to come to the fore.
The question that merits our attention is what kind of leaders these new voices will be. Will the ranks of the technocrats be strengthened? Or will the local political elite gain the upper hand?
It won't be difficult to see the direction politics is taking by looking at how the center cultivates people politically from different social roles.
China's second-generation leader Deng Xiaoping (
Jiang, who later began to interact in new ways with the US and who led China to a successful Olympic bid, increased his prestige within the party significantly. What Deng did for Jiang might now be done by Jiang for Hu.
The appearance of China's new leader won't be like the election of a new leader in a democratic society, when reforms are carried out in a sweeping manner on the basis of one's political platform. After all, China's new leader is still a product of the old political system.
Hsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer residing in Beijing.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to