China has blocked Meta Platforms Inc’s acquisition of artificial intelligence (AI) start-up Manus, the top economic planning body said yesterday, after a regulatory review in which Beijing reportedly also restricted two cofounders from leaving the country.
Facebook owner Meta had agreed to acquire Manus, an AI agent created by a company founded in China, but is now based in Singapore, the two firms said in December last year.
However, analysts had warned then the deal could fall afoul of regulators amid a fierce technological rivalry between Washington and Beijing.
Photo: AFP
The Financial Times last month reported that China had restricted two Manus cofounders from leaving the country, citing three people with knowledge of the matter.
Chief executive Xiao Hong (肖弘) and chief scientist Ji Yichao (季逸超), who are usually based in Singapore, were reportedly summoned to a meeting in Beijing last month and told they were not allowed to leave China because of a regulatory review of the Meta acquisition.
The Chinese National Development and Reform Commission said in a statement that it would “prohibit the foreign investment in the acquisition of the Manus project,” and that it “requires the parties involved to withdraw the acquisition transaction,” without naming Meta.
Meta said in a statement that “the transaction complied fully with applicable law.”
“We anticipate an appropriate resolution to the inquiry,” it added.
Meta in December last year said that the deal — the financial details of which were not disclosed — would “bring a leading agent to billions of people and unlock opportunities for businesses across our products.”
The purchase was likely aimed at expanding Meta’s AI agent task capabilities, and could be worth more than US$2 billion, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts said.
Manus, created by start-up Butterfly Effect, can sift through and summarize resumes or create a stock analysis Web site.
That move did not come as a surprise, as China has always hoped for greater control over its homegrown technology, analysts said.
“This is the latest in that trajectory of restrictions,” National University of Singapore associate political science professor Chong Ja Ian (莊嘉穎) said.
China and the US “are increasingly looking to separate their tech stacks,” he said, adding that places like Singapore would be increasingly unable to “shield firms from such scrutiny.”
Beijing is trying to send a clear signal that in areas of “strategic priorities” such as AI, it would increase its scrutiny to prevent talent, tech data and capital leakage, said Dylan Loh (駱明輝), an associate professor at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University.
“It shows they are prepared to act and also securitize the AI space,” Loh added.
“The China government’s decision to block the deal is expected and it has already created some chilling effect on other Chinese AI companies who may now need to rethink their going global approach,” said Chandy Ye (葉春蓉), a dual-qualified Hong Kong solicitor and mainland China lawyer.
The government yesterday approved applications by Alphabet Inc’s Google to invest NT$27.08 billion (US$859.98 million) in Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said in a statement. The Department of Investment Review approved two investments proposed by Google, with much of the funds to be used for data processing and electronic information supply services, as well as inventory procurement businesses in the semiconductor field, the ministry said. It marks the second consecutive year that Google has applied to increase its investment in Taiwan. Google plans to infuse NT$25.34 billion into Charter Investments Ltd (特許投資顧問) through its Singapore-based subsidiary Fructan Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd, and
Micron Technology Inc is a driving force pushing the US Congress to pass legislation that would put new export restrictions on equipment its Chinese competitors use to make their chips, according to people familiar with the matter. A US House of Representatives panel yesterday was to vote on the “MATCH Act,” a bill designed to close gaps in restrictions on chipmaking equipment. It would also pressure foreign companies that sell equipment to Chinese chipmaking facilities to align with export curbs on US companies like Lam Research Corp and Applied Materials Inc. The bill targets facilities operated by China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc
Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings’ planned acquisition of Foodpanda’s Taiwan operations has yet to enter the formal review stage, as regulators await supplementary documents, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said yesterday. Acting FTC Chairman Chen Chih-min (陳志民) told the legislature’s Economics Committee that although Grab submitted its application on March 27, the case has not been officially accepted because required materials remain incomplete. Once the filing is finalized, the FTC would launch a formal probe into the deal, focusing on issues such as cross-shareholding and potential restrictions on market competition, Chen told lawmakers. Grab last month announced that it would acquire
SECOND-RATE: Models distilled from US products do not perform the same as the original and undo measures that ensure the systems are neutral, the US’ cable said The US Department of State has ordered a global push to bring attention to what it said are widespread efforts by Chinese companies, including artificial intelligence (AI) start-up DeepSeek (深度求索), to steal intellectual property from US AI labs, according to a diplomatic cable. The cable, dated Friday and sent to diplomatic and consular posts around the world, instructs diplomatic staff to speak to their foreign counterparts about “concerns over adversaries’ extraction and distillation of US AI models.” Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones to lower the costs of training a powerful new
RSS