Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday left its record capital expenditures plan unchanged for this year as robust client demand for 5-nanometer technology is expected to quickly fill a capacity hole after the US government announced restrictions against supplying Huawei Technologies Co (華為).
The world’s biggest contract chipmaker had said that it planned to spend between US$15 billion and US$16 billion this year primarily to expand capacity for advanced 5-nanometer and 7-nanometer technologies, and develop 3-nanometer technology.
“It looks like we will see a hole in demand for 5-nanometer capacity this year, but I believe this hole will soon be filled,” TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) told a media briefing after the company’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Hsinchu.
Photo: Ashley Pon, Bloomberg
If HiSilicon Technologies Co (海思), a semiconductor arm of Huawei, cancels orders, TSMC’s other clients would make up for that lost capacity, as they have approached the company about placing orders, Liu said in response to shareholder concern that the US’ latest chip supply restrictions on foreign chipmakers might put a damper on TSMC’s revenue growth.
TSMC’s 5-nanometer technology is the most advanced technology available, and HiSilicon, Apple Inc and Advanced Micro Devices Inc are typically early adopters of the company’s most advanced technologies.
“We are not going to alter our capital spending for this year, nor are we going to revise our revenue growth outlook for this year,” Liu said.
However, he said that the chipmaker is facing challenges due to US-China trade tensions.
TSMC in April slightly trimmed its revenue growth for this year to an annual expansion of 15 to 18 percent, down from a previous forecast of more than 17 percent, as the COVID-19 pandemic dampened demand for smartphones.
The pandemic has not sidetracked the chipmaker’s upgrade to 5-nanometer and 3-nanometer technologies, Liu said.
Mass production of 3-nanometer technology would start as planned in the second half of 2022, with 4-nanometer technology, an enhanced version of 5-nanometer technology, being mass produced in 2023, Liu added.
Officials also discussed a plan to build a US$12 billion fab in Arizona, as shareholders expressed concern that the investment would weigh on profitability.
Subsidies from the US federal and state governments would be a determining factor in the final decision to build the fab, Liu said, adding that TSMC has not yet signed a formal agreement with US authorities.
“If the US [federal and state] governments are willing to cover our running costs, our profit margin will not be affected,” Liu said.
In such a case, the Arizona fab would definitely make a profit, as its gross margin would be similar to that of the corporate level of the company, he said.
TSMC said that the US subsidies are a crucial component of its plan to construct the fab, adding that it hopes subsidies would make US manufacturing costs comparable to those in Taiwan and China.
The firm’s raw material suppliers, such as chemicals and special gas companies, also plan to build production lines in Arizona, where Intel Corp and several other semiconductor firms have built a solid supply chain, Liu said.
TSMC shares yesterday closed up 0.31 percent at NT$319 in Taipei trading.
JITTERS: Nexperia has a 20 percent market share for chips powering simpler features such as window controls, and changing supply chains could take years European carmakers are looking into ways to scratch components made with parts from China, spooked by deepening geopolitical spats playing out through chipmaker Nexperia BV and Beijing’s export controls on rare earths. To protect operations from trade ructions, several automakers are pushing major suppliers to find permanent alternatives to Chinese semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The industry is considering broader changes to its supply chain to adapt to shifting geopolitics, Europe’s main suppliers lobby CLEPA head Matthias Zink said. “We had some indications already — questions like: ‘How can you supply me without this dependency on China?’” Zink, who also
The number of Taiwanese working in the US rose to a record high of 137,000 last year, driven largely by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) rapid overseas expansion, according to government data released yesterday. A total of 666,000 Taiwanese nationals were employed abroad last year, an increase of 45,000 from 2023 and the highest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, data from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) showed. Overseas employment had steadily increased between 2009 and 2019, peaking at 739,000, before plunging to 319,000 in 2021 amid US-China trade tensions, global supply chain shifts, reshoring by Taiwanese companies and
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) received about NT$147 billion (US$4.71 billion) in subsidies from the US, Japanese, German and Chinese governments over the past two years for its global expansion. Financial data compiled by the world’s largest contract chipmaker showed the company secured NT$4.77 billion in subsidies from the governments in the third quarter, bringing the total for the first three quarters of the year to about NT$71.9 billion. Along with the NT$75.16 billion in financial aid TSMC received last year, the chipmaker obtained NT$147 billion in subsidies in almost two years, the data showed. The subsidies received by its subsidiaries —
OUTLOOK: Pat Gelsinger said he did not expect the heavy AI infrastructure investments by the major cloud service providers to cause an AI bubble to burst soon Building a resilient energy supply chain is crucial for Taiwan to develop artificial intelligence (AI) technology and grow its economy, former Intel Corp chief executive officer Pat Gelsinger said yesterday. Gelsinger, now a general partner at the US venture capital firm Playground Global LLC, was asked at a news conference in Taipei about his views on Taiwan’s hardware development and growing concern over an AI bubble. “Today, the greatest issue in Taiwan isn’t even in the software or in architecture. It is energy,” Gelsinger said. “You are not in the position to have a resilient energy supply chain, and that,