Xiaomi Corp (小米) became the biggest smartphone seller in China without an extensive — or expensive — collection of patents. That low-cost approach is now backfiring as accusations of technology infringement stall its global push.
Ericsson AB sued Xiaomi in India, saying the smartphone maker had not licensed inventions by Ericsson that enable wireless devices to connect to networks. Judges banned some Xiaomi devices in the company’s biggest overseas market, pending another hearing next month.
The lawsuit threatens founder Lei Jun’s (雷軍) drive to boost next year’s shipments to 100 million units, a five-fold gain from last year, with an eye toward overtaking Samsung Electronics Co and Apple Inc globally. It also puts Xiaomi’s strategy of selling devices for near-cost at risk as the Beijing-based company increases spending on research and licensing to avoid the legal battles Samsung and Apple fought around the world.
“The nightmare will keep on going,” said Neil Shah, Mumbai-based research director for devices at Counterpoint Research. “Patent companies in other countries will now go after Xiaomi in other markets and use the India market as the example.”
Low research costs helped Xiaomi go from startup to the world’s No. 3 smartphone vendor within four years of its founding. Virtually all those sales were in China, where weak enforcement of intellectual property rights meant Xiaomi was “much more protected,” Shah said.
Xiaomi says its patent portfolio does not make it any more exposed than other makers using Googe Inc’s Android software.
“Our IP [intellectual property] situation is the exact same as everybody else’s in this space,” Xiaomi vice president for global operations Hugo Barra said in an interview last month.
Technology companies often have their own hoard of intellectual property, which includes patents and trademarks, to protect their innovations and provide a type of currency when it comes to using that of others.
Xiaomi’s challenges in this area are noticed by rivals.
“The IP issue may delay the expansion speed of the Chinese company,” Sony Mobile Communications Inc president and chief executive officer Hiroki Totoki said in response to questions in Tokyo on Friday last week.
Sony’s Xperia devices compete with Xiaomi.
The patent portfolio is small because Xiaomi is young and must build it over time, said Denis Berger, a patent lawyer at Eiger Law in Shanghai.
Entering an overseas market with a limited portfolio can be a “calculated risk,” he said.
Xiaomi focused on software while offering devices “at or near cost,” Barra said.
Xiaomi is working to expand its portfolio globally after filing 600 patent applications last year, company spokeswoman Joy Han said. It will make 1,000 applications this year and double that in each of the next two years, she said.
“We file a ton of patents, particularly in China, but not only in China, around the world,” Barra said. “We license patents, buy patents. It’s the same thing as everybody else has done.”
Ericsson holds essential patents for 2G, 3G and 4G mobile wireless technology, which means any seller of products compliant with those standards must secure licenses, Ericsson spokesman Johannes Persson said.
“Xiaomi refused to respond in any way regarding a fair license to Ericsson’s intellectual property,” Persson said.
Xiaomi suspended all India sales to comply with the Dec. 8 Delhi High Court ruling in Ericsson’s lawsuit. A Xiaomi appeal on Dec. 16 led to a partial lifting of the ban, for devices using Qualcomm Inc chips.
While Qualcomm assists its customers to get licenses from other patent holders, Xiaomi can not rely on such help in all cases, said Bryan Wang, China country manager for Forrester Research.
“It will become a major issue that Xiaomi needs to address,” Wang said.
Xiaomi has a license agreement for 3G multimode units, while details can not be disclosed, Qualcomm said in an e-mail.
Even if Xiaomi quadruples patent applications to 8,000 by the end of 2016 as planned, it would lag older competitors.
A group including Apple, Ericsson, BlackBerry Ltd, Sony Corp and Microsoft Corp agreed in 2011 to pay US$4.5 billion for about 6,000 patents held by Nortel Networks Corp. Google’s 2012 acquisition of Motorola Mobility for US$12.5 billion included 17,000 patents.
Huawei Technologies Co (華為) had 36,511 patents at the end of last year, the company said. ZTE Corp (中興) had 17,000 patents as of June.
Xiaomi might need to buy or license portfolios from other companies, said Kiranjeet Kaur, a Singapore-based analyst at International Data Corp.
“In the short term, Xiaomi may need to pay licensing fees, but eventually it may need to build up its patent portfolio,” Kaur said. “That won’t come without cost.”
EXTRATERRITORIAL REACH: China extended its legal jurisdiction to ban some dual-use goods of Chinese origin from being sold to the US, even by third countries Beijing has set out to extend its domestic laws across international borders with a ban on selling some goods to the US that applies to companies both inside and outside China. The new export control rules are China’s first attempt to replicate the extraterritorial reach of US and European sanctions by covering Chinese products or goods with Chinese parts in them. In an announcement this week, China declared it is banning the sale of dual-use items to the US military and also the export to the US of materials such as gallium and germanium. Companies and people overseas would be subject to
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) yesterday said that Intel Corp would find itself in the same predicament as it did four years ago if its board does not come up with a core business strategy. Chang made the remarks in response to reporters’ questions about the ailing US chipmaker, once an archrival of TSMC, during a news conference in Taipei for the launch of the second volume of his autobiography. Intel unexpectedly announced the immediate retirement of former chief executive officer Pat Gelsinger last week, ending his nearly four-year tenure and ending his attempts to revive the
WORLD DOMINATION: TSMC’s lead over second-placed Samsung has grown as the latter faces increased Chinese competition and the end of clients’ product life cycles Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) retained the No. 1 title in the global pure-play wafer foundry business in the third quarter of this year, seeing its market share growing to 64.9 percent to leave South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co, the No. 2 supplier, further behind, Taipei-based TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said in a report. TSMC posted US$23.53 billion in sales in the July-September period, up 13.0 percent from a quarter earlier, which boosted its market share to 64.9 percent, up from 62.3 percent in the second quarter, the report issued on Monday last week showed. TSMC benefited from the debut of flagship
TENSE TIMES: Formosa Plastics sees uncertainty surrounding the incoming Trump administration in the US, geopolitical tensions and China’s faltering economy Formosa Plastics Group (台塑集團), Taiwan’s largest industrial conglomerate, yesterday posted overall revenue of NT$118.61 billion (US$3.66 billion) for last month, marking a 7.2 percent rise from October, but a 2.5 percent fall from one year earlier. The group has mixed views about its business outlook for the current quarter and beyond, as uncertainty builds over the US power transition and geopolitical tensions. Formosa Plastics Corp (台灣塑膠), a vertically integrated supplier of plastic resins and petrochemicals, reported a monthly uptick of 15.3 percent in its revenue to NT$18.15 billion, as Typhoon Kong-rey postponed partial shipments slated for October and last month, it said. The
RSS