The high court in London on Wednesday condemned as “deeply disturbing” a refusal by the US to disclose evidence that could prove a UK resident held at Guantanamo Bay was tortured before confessing to terrorism offences.
The court said there was “no rational basis” for the US failure to reveal the contents of documents essential to the defense of Binyam Mohamed, who faces the death penalty.
In a particularly damning passage, UK Lord Justice Thomas and Justice Lloyd Jones said claims by Mohamed’s lawyers that the US was refusing to release the papers because “torturers do not readily hand over evidence of their conduct” could not be dismissed and required an answer.
The judges said they were unaware of any precedent for such serious allegations against “the government of a foreign friendly state and our oldest and closest ally” as those made in this case.
The US had not provided any explanation for its conduct, though it had had “ample time” to do so, the judges said.
Thomas and Lloyd said the documents provided the “only independent evidence” capable of helping Mohamed and his defense.
Suppressing the material “would be to deny him the opportunity of timely justice in respect of the charges against him,” which was a principle dating back to “at least the time of Magna Carta and which is a basic part of our common law and of democratic values.”
They said UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband conceded there was an “arguable case” that Mohamed had been subjected to torture and inhuman treatment. Yet Miliband also wanted to suppress relevant documents, not because they would reveal any intelligence operations but because the US claimed that if they were disclosed serious harm would be done to “intelligence sharing” between the UK and the US.
The judges said it was clear the UK had “facilitated” Mohamed’s interrogation when he was unlawfully detained in Pakistan before being secretly rendered to Morocco, Afghanistan, and then to Guantanamo. The US was using confessions made after two years of unlawful “incommunicado detention” on charges where the death penalty might be sought, the judges said yesterday.
They noted that a military prosecutor at the US base had recently resigned in protest against the treatment of prisoners, including the use of a “frequent flyer program.” The judges described this as a “euphemism for a sleep deprivation program.”
They said: “This is a practice which the United Kingdom expressly prohibits.”
Charges against Mohamed — including that he was involved in a dirty bomb plot — have been dropped, allegedly to prevent the US from revealing torture evidence. The US authorities now planned to charge him with other offences, the judges said on Wednesday.
The judges took the extraordinary step of inviting the media to challenge previous decisions to hold many of the case’s hearings in camera.
“Although the argument took place in closed session,” they said, “the issue is one of considerable importance in the context of open justice [and] to the rule of law.”
They suspended proceedings pending a case in the US courts, where defense lawyers are also trying to force disclosure. That federal court, the UK judges said on Wednesday, might be given explanations about US conduct “denied to this court.”
Clive Stafford Smith, the director of the charity Reprieve, described Mohamed’s treatment by the US as a “litany of misconduct.”
“First they tortured him, then they held him for more than six years without trial, now they want to cover up evidence that could set him free,” he said.
“What is the point of a ‘special relationship’ if the UK government cannot secure basic justice for Mr Mohamed?” Smith asked.
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their