After the media, the oligarchs and the opposition, Vladimir Putin’s Russia is turning up the heat on the arts, with a “blasphemous” opera, a raunchy teen dance show and an “insulting” Hollywood film all taking fire.
Claiming a mission to protect the sensibilities of the Russian people, the Kremlin and the Orthodox Church are leaning on artists to imbue their creations with greater morality.
The attacks go over well in a society steeped in the conservative anti-Western values preached by Putin, who has been isolated by the West over the Ukraine crisis.
 
                    Photo: AP
Since the Russian strongman burst onto the center stage in 1999, several groups have been called to heel, from journalists to business magnates and human rights activists.Now the authorities’ sights are trained on the cultural sector, with the government keen to promote a new approach.
“The time has come to formulate our own vision of ourselves as heirs to Russia’s great, unique civilization,” Culture Minister Vladimir Medinsky said, explaining the recent banning of the release of the Hollywood thriller Child 44, about a serial killer operating in Joseph Stalin’s Russia.
The minister accused the film, which stars Vincent Cassel and Gary Oldman, of the “distortion of historical facts” and depicting Soviet Army officers as “blood-thirsty ghouls”.
 
                    Photo: EPA
A few weeks before that, the object of popular wrath was the head of the state-funded Novosibirsk State Opera and Ballet Theater.
Boris Mezdrich was fired for sensationally depicting Jesus Christ as a character in an erotic movie in his production of Richard Wagner’s opera Tannhaeuser, triggering an outcry from spectators and the church.
Other productions or works to cause a furore this year included a mural by a street artist in the eastern city of Perm showing the first man in space, Russia’s Yuri Gagarin, as a “Jesus of science,” being crucified.
The artist faces up to one year in prison. An exhibition by Canadian artist Frank Rodick of pictures of his dead mother also caused scandal, with church authorities in the Baltic Sea exclave of Kaliningrad calling for “limits on what is tolerable in art”.
In another vein entirely, three teens filmed twerking in front of a World War II memorial were sentenced to up to 15 days imprisonment.The sentencing came after a video of girls in leotards twerking at a dance school in the southwestern city of Orenburg went viral, prompting the Investigative Committee to launch an indecency probe.
‘WE MUST PROTECT OURSELVES’
Artists whose work is deemed “blasphemous” also face having the book thrown at them.
In July 2013, lawmakers adopted legislation making it a crime to insult believers’ feelings, punishable by up to three years in prison. From a dozen cases in 2013 the number of prosecutions under the law rose to around 50 last year.
For film director Sergei Selyanov, producer of animated films inspired by Russian folklore, the “censorship aims to fill the void left by the (loss of an) historic national identity, which was buried together with the USSR”.
The current concept of Russian nationhood, said Konstantin Remchukov, chief editor of the Nezavisimaya Gazeta daily, is based on “two obligatory elements, patriotism and anti-Westernism.” Hostility to the West has flourished among both the elite and ordinary Russians, who have been fed a staple diet of anti-Western fare by the media over the Ukraine crisis and the legalization of gay marriage in several countries.
A troupe of actors from the western city of Pskov recently came out swinging — against a play in which they themselves were cast.
One of the actors, Sergei Popkov, took issue with the character of a dwarf who becomes king, seeing in it an “allusion to our president.”
“We must protect ourselves...against the West which wants to destroy everything here,” he said, demanding a return to Soviet-style cultural censorship.
World War II, or the Great Patriotic War as Russians call it, is a prime example of a sacrosanct subject, where self-censorship is exercised. Bookshops in Moscow recently pulled their copies of Art Spiegelman’s Pulitzer prize-winning graphic novel about a Holocaust survivor, Maus, because it features a swastika on the cover.
With parliament having adopted a law in December banning Nazi propaganda the stores decided to play safe rather than risk prosecution.
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan

President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party

The older you get, and the more obsessed with your health, the more it feels as if life comes down to numbers: how many more years you can expect; your lean body mass; your percentage of visceral fat; how dense your bones are; how many kilos you can squat; how long you can deadhang; how often you still do it; your levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol; your resting heart rate; your overnight blood oxygen level; how quickly you can run; how many steps you do in a day; how many hours you sleep; how fast you are shrinking; how