An anti-infiltration bill proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party, which is pushing it through the Legislative Yuan, has met strong opposition from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) lawmakers, but it is still expected to be passed into law before the end of this year.
The first article of the bill states that the law is intended to prevent infiltration and interference by external enemies; ensure national security and social stability; and maintain the nation’s sovereignty, and its freedom, democracy and constitutional order.
Although no countries are mentioned by name, the phrase “external enemies” is generally understood to refer to the only country that harbors a deep animosity toward Taiwan and covets its territory: China. It is no surprise that the KMT and the PFP, which both maintain frequent and intensive contacts — and act in collusion — with China, are so strongly opposed to the bill.
Red China has been making good use of its Confucius Institutes in combination with individuals, media outlets, non-governmental organizations and political donations to infiltrate academic and political circles in European and North American democracies.
It has used the academic and political freedoms that exist in these democracies to destroy those freedoms.
China’s actions have already been exposed and countermeasures against these institutes have been taken on several occasions, with one Confucius Institute after another being closed down.
Australia has its Espionage and Foreign Interference Act, while the US has the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act and the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and it is pushing for enactment of a countering the Chinese government and Communist Party’s political influence operations act.
In Canada, there is Bill C-76 on campaign advertising transparency, which bans foreign institutions from paying for party campaign advertising.
Last month, the UK parliament issued a report warning that the higher education system was overconfident. It said that higher education institutions in the UK severely underestimate the risk of Chinese interference, and that vigilance and existing response plans in the government and school administrations is clearly insufficient.
Taiwan is on the front line of Chinese expansion and infiltration.
Self-confessed Chinese spy William Wang Liqiang (王立強) said that China is using its cyberarmy and political donations to control Taiwan’s elections.
Was this just empty talk, or is it true, as they say, that where there is smoke, there is fire?
Taiwan has rushed to draft the anti-infiltration bill — better late than never.
Does anyone really oppose it, or is it just people in another nation trying their best to infiltrate Taiwan by all means or traitors working against Taiwan’s best interests by colluding with that country?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a former National Tsing Hua University professor.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS