An anti-infiltration bill proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party, which is pushing it through the Legislative Yuan, has met strong opposition from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) lawmakers, but it is still expected to be passed into law before the end of this year.
The first article of the bill states that the law is intended to prevent infiltration and interference by external enemies; ensure national security and social stability; and maintain the nation’s sovereignty, and its freedom, democracy and constitutional order.
Although no countries are mentioned by name, the phrase “external enemies” is generally understood to refer to the only country that harbors a deep animosity toward Taiwan and covets its territory: China. It is no surprise that the KMT and the PFP, which both maintain frequent and intensive contacts — and act in collusion — with China, are so strongly opposed to the bill.
Red China has been making good use of its Confucius Institutes in combination with individuals, media outlets, non-governmental organizations and political donations to infiltrate academic and political circles in European and North American democracies.
It has used the academic and political freedoms that exist in these democracies to destroy those freedoms.
China’s actions have already been exposed and countermeasures against these institutes have been taken on several occasions, with one Confucius Institute after another being closed down.
Australia has its Espionage and Foreign Interference Act, while the US has the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act and the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and it is pushing for enactment of a countering the Chinese government and Communist Party’s political influence operations act.
In Canada, there is Bill C-76 on campaign advertising transparency, which bans foreign institutions from paying for party campaign advertising.
Last month, the UK parliament issued a report warning that the higher education system was overconfident. It said that higher education institutions in the UK severely underestimate the risk of Chinese interference, and that vigilance and existing response plans in the government and school administrations is clearly insufficient.
Taiwan is on the front line of Chinese expansion and infiltration.
Self-confessed Chinese spy William Wang Liqiang (王立強) said that China is using its cyberarmy and political donations to control Taiwan’s elections.
Was this just empty talk, or is it true, as they say, that where there is smoke, there is fire?
Taiwan has rushed to draft the anti-infiltration bill — better late than never.
Does anyone really oppose it, or is it just people in another nation trying their best to infiltrate Taiwan by all means or traitors working against Taiwan’s best interests by colluding with that country?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a former National Tsing Hua University professor.
Translated by Perry Svensson
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS