Taiwan has the most press freedom in East Asia, the US-based Freedom House said in its Freedom and the Media: A Downward Spiral report released on Tuesday.
Taiwan scored 4 on the five-point scale, one of only 35 nations to do so, while Japan, South Korea and Mongolia tied with 3, Hong Kong rated a 2 and China was given zero.
The report said that freedom of the media has been deteriorating around the world over the past decade, including in some of the most influential democracies, and that the impact on the state of democracy is what makes threats to global media freedom so dangerous. The decline in global press freedom closely tracked an overall decline in political rights and civil liberties, it said.
The group should know. It began, in 1980, to publish an annual Freedom of the Press report, a companion to the annual Freedom in the World reports launched in 1972, which analyze media independence in the world for the previous year.
It continued to do so until 2017, when the report for 2016 rated Taiwan as “free,” with a score of 25 out of 100, the same as the UK, while Norway ranked first, with a score of 8. North Korea was bottom of the rankings with a score of 98 and China had 87.
However, what makes the Freedom and the Media: A Downward Spiral report such compelling — and gutwrenching — reading are the three companion pieces: The Implications for Democracy of China’s Globalizing Media Influence, A New Toolbox for Co-opting the Media and Why Social Media Are Still Worth Saving.
For Taiwan, the first of the three is of crucial importance, and it echoes warnings given in a Reporters Without Borders report released on March 26, China’s Pursuit of a New World Media Order, which drew a link between Beijing’s attempts to dominate the international media and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Belt and Road Initiative.
The Implications for Democracy says that the Chinese government, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and various proxies have rapidly gained influence on media production outside of China, enhancing the CCP’s ability to “interfere aggressively in other countries, should it choose to do so.”
It says that they are influencing the content of news media around the world “through three primary strategies: promoting the CCP’s narratives, suppressing critical viewpoints and managing content delivery systems.”
It warns that they “have the potential to undermine key features of democratic governance and best practices for media freedom,” flouting transparency rules, undermining competition, establishing channels for political meddling and undermining the rule of law.
The report cites several examples, many of which have been reported in the pages of this newspaper, including fake news stories originating in China aimed at undermining the government, offers to buy popular pro-Taiwan Facebook pages and attempts by a company owned by a China-friendly media tycoon to purchase stakes in a major cable company.
The report makes several recommendations on steps governments can take to counter Beijing, including improving transparency requirements on advertorial spending and economic ties to the Chinese government.
To counter the overall increase in media representation worldwide, Freedom House urges governments and others to take action against breaches of media freedom, including speaking out against violence against journalists, standing up for the value of a free press, supporting civic education about the need for press freedom and supporting technology that increases journalistic freedom.
However, these are not just tasks for governments. Individuals and groups must do their part to ensure media freedom and literacy, such as the coalition of university and high-school groups that in April established the Youth Front for Boycotting Fake News to improve the quality of news in Taiwan and combat false reports aimed at undermining the nation’s sovereignty.
Such efforts deserve everyone’s full support.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and