The nation’s first and second nuclear power plants were built in volcanic areas before Taiwanese understood much about the dangers of nuclear power, while the third was built atop shale on a fault line.
The government built storage facilities for low-level nuclear waste on scenic Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼), a location chosen by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) officials — self-proclaimed “nuclear power experts” — and supported by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government being somewhat economical with the truth.
As the saying goes: “Man proposes, but God disposes.”
A partial core meltdown caused a serious accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in the US on March 28, 1979, followed by a reactor explosion at Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union on April 25 and 26, 1986. With the radiation leak at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in March 2011, the death knell of any pretense of safe nuclear power was sounded.
Then there is the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮), finally mothballed in late 2014 due to public concerns, albeit not until the government had already spent NT$284 billion (US$9.66 billion at the current exchange rate) on its construction.
That is not to say that the issue of nuclear power plants in Taiwan has been resolved, as the first three must still be decommissioned and a solution must be found to safely store nearly 20,000 clusters of used nuclear rods.
Taipower is set to decide the final disposal site for high-level nuclear waste by 2028, initiate construction of the facilities in 2045 and begin their operation in 2055.
The Matsu Islands are a proposed location for the facility, which would be administered by Lienchiang County. They top the list, despite KMT Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng’s (陳雪生) warnings that such a move is sure to be opposed by local residents, as well as the Lienchiang and Penghu county governments.
Some in Kinmen County also question the fairness of building storage facilities there, since the outlying county does not benefit from the electricity produced by nuclear power plants.
It is funny how the KMT’s die-hard supporters in the strongly pro-blue Kinmen and Lienchiang counties continue to support the party, even though it has consistently championed nuclear power. Now these same people are opposing the construction of nuclear waste storage facilities in their backyard.
Self-proclaimed nuclear power experts will have their work cut out for them in the coming years, trying to convince people of the safety of high-level nuclear power waste storage after saying how safe nuclear power is in the first place.
They will do their utmost to sell the idea before Taipower makes its decision on the location of the facilities. They can be expected to call on local residents to put their faith in the experts and not to succumb to groundless fears.
The actions of these dubious “experts” will decide the fate of the entire public. Corruption is indeed terrible, but constructing nuclear power plants is so much worse.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Eddy Chang
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS