Tsai foreign policy is positive
After the position was left vacant for a long time, US President Donald Trump has finally nominated an official for Asian and Pacific affairs. Randall Schriver, former deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs under the administration of former US president George W. Bush, is expected to be appointed as assistant secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific affairs, the top Asia policy job at the Pentagon.
He is a Taiwan advocate and an expert in Asia-Pacific affairs.
In his nomination hearing, Schriver asserted that the US should normalize arms sales to Taiwan and invest more resources in the security of its Asian partners. The nomination might be seen as a positive development for the Taiwan-US relationship.
Trump’s nomination of a Taiwan-friendly official, along with a series of moves by the US government, has indicated a warmer relationship with Taiwan.
During President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) state visit to Taiwan’s diplomatic allies in the southern Pacific, she received extensive media coverage during her stopovers in Hawaii and Guam.
In addition, two Republican members of the US House of Representatives proposed a draft Taiwan Security Act, the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs has passed a Taiwan Travel Act and Taiwanese are now in the US’ Global Entry Program.
Taiwan-US relations are crucial for Taiwan, the US and the stability of the Asia-Pacific region.
The cross-strait relationship is another critical issue in the area. For the US government, maintaining stability and peace between Taiwan and China is the top priority and it fits US interests.
Tsai has emphasized that her cross-strait policy is to maintain the “status quo.”
In her Double Ten National Day address, Tsai mentioned her four “will nots” principle: Taiwan will not change its goodwill, change its commitments, revert to the old path of confrontation or bow to pressure.
The government has done its best to show goodwill toward China. The current cross-strait relationship can be viewed as a cold peace compared with the relationship under the administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Furthermore, based on Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech at the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th National Congress last month, while Taiwan remains a crucial issue, the Chinese government has other priorities at the moment.
The “status quo” might remain and is still acceptable for all counterparts in this region.
Ian Easton, a research fellow of the Project 2049 Institute focusing on Asia-Pacific issues, has said that the US government welcomes a stable and peaceful cross-strait relationship.
It encourages both sides of the Taiwan Strait to conduct constructive dialogue and maintain the security of the region.
Before Trump’s visit to Asia, people were worried that Taiwan might become a bargaining chip for the US.
However, it has turned out that the Taiwan issue was not mentioned during any formal discussions. The outcome of Trump’s tour is positive, because no news is good news.
Even though uncertainty is the trademark of the Trump administration, the Taiwan-US relationship remains confident and stable, and there is still room for improvement.
Although many challenges lie ahead, Tsai’s foreign policy is moving forward steadily.
Jack Lu
Taipei
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS