In the wake of this week’s “Paradise Papers” revelations, fresh attention is focusing on the vexed topic of global tax transparency. While the disclosures in the 13.4 million newly released documents are financial in nature, they have already had significant political ramifications, including in London and Washington, especially after the release of the Panama Papers last year.
The Paradise Papers have put new exposure on hundreds of high-net worth individuals and politicians across the world, as well as wide-ranging multinational firms. However, at the hearty of the affair are the internal workings of numerous UK territories.
During the process of decolonization, Britain held on to a global network of islands, which either voted to remain UK territories or have not chosen independence. Amongst these are the present-day 14 overseas territories and three British dependencies, and it is these remnants of empire that are amongst the world’s leading centers of international tax avoidance.
Illustration: Louise Ting
London has taken actions in previous years to ensure that these islands have fairer and more open tax systems, but this remains work in progress. On Tuesday, British Labour Party shadow chancellor of the exchequer John McDonnell described the Paradise Papers disclosures as the “biggest tax scandal of this generation” and called for a UK public enquiry.
British Prime Minister Theresa May has said she wants “greater transparency,” but has refused to commit to such a public probe.
Last year, after the Panama Papers releases, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn proposed that the government impose direct rule on any of its territories if they do not conform fully to UK tax laws.
London has cracked down in the past in similar ways, so this is not inconceivable.
In 2009, it imposed direct rule on the Turks and Caicos after local officials were accused of selling government land for personal gain. The islands saw home rule restored only after the local government passed acts that mandated tax information-sharing with the British government.
Following the Panama Papers revelations last year, the UK government did not take any comparable measures for any of the territories that were named in them, but international and domestic pressure to act is mounting.
In Brussels, European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs Pierre Moscovici has since the Paradise Papers disclosures promised to look into the matters swiftly and to potentially expedite an EU blacklist of offshore tax entities.
In Washington, Democrats have called for a probe into the Paradise Papers, including allegations of US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s son-in-law through a reported shipping venture in Russia.
US Senator Bernie Sanders has slammed what he believes is an “international oligarchy in which a handful of billionaires own and control a significant part of the global economy,” and has called for congressional consideration of US President Donald Trump’s proposed tax reforms to be halted.
Even further afield in the Asia-Pacific, the Australian Taxation Office has said it will investigate and work with partner agencies across the world following the Paradise Papers disclosures.
The Indian Board of Revenue confirmed it is already investigating numerous tax havens.
While the UK imposing direct rule on its territories is, in principle, a relatively straight-forward process, critics have said that a consequence of seeking to close down these centers of tax avoidance would be that people and firms would simply move their money from one jurisdiction to another where there might be even fewer tax regulations and less transparency.
Many have therefore said that what is needed are greater harmonized global moves toward tax transparency.
In May, the UK hosted an international anti-corruption summit and it has been at the fore of the global debate on tackling international tax avoidance. The 2013 G8 summit in Northern Ireland, for instance, resulted in the Lough Erne Declaration, which urged countries to “fight the scourge of tax evasion.”
Leaders agreed, for instance, to measures that would combat the illegal evasion of taxes, as well as the use of tax havens and loopholes.
Britain was also the first member of the G20 to establish a public central registry of company beneficial-ownership information, and in 2010 it introduced some of the world’s strictest legislation on bribery, making it a criminal offence for a company to fail to prevent a bribe from being paid, among other offenses.
Moreover, London co-chaired a UN panel that put tackling corruption at the heart of the new UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Nonetheless, the Paradise Papers are ratcheting up pressure further to increase tax transparency. While dramatic action in the coming days is unlikely, campaigning at national and global levels for new measures to tackle this issue are likely to intensify as new revelations continue to surface.
Andrew Hammond is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS