The out-of-sync calendar
There have been media reports that a postgraduate student at National Taiwan University had his thesis rejected by the school because he had used a Gregorian calendar date on its cover instead of following the Republic of China (ROC) chronology.
Because of this, the thesis was not approved and the student risked not receiving his degree, so in the end, he had to use the ROC chronology instead of the regular, internationally accepted date format.
The student criticized the school for imposing its ideology and ignoring international practice, even though there is no legal basis for doing so.
The response from the university was that “other schools do the same,” but the Ministry of Education said it does not regulate schools in such detail, and that it is up to each school to decide their thesis formats.
It is widely known that when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government occupied Taiwan after World War II, it adopted the ROC calendar, which had to be used for everything, including birth dates, government documents and even banknotes.
It was only when students were taught international history that they suddenly encountered Gregorian calendar dates and had to learn the formula for converting between ROC and Gregorian dates: ROC year plus 1911 gives the Gregorian calendar year, and subtracting 1911 from the Gregorian calendar year gives the year according to ROC chronology.
This formula followed us wherever we went: In Taiwan, every document uses the ROC date, but international academic contacts, diplomacy, international trade, travel and other overseas contacts use the Gregorian calendar format. It is all very confusing.
The thesis incident has highlighted an oddity. The legal basis for the ROC calendar system is the Act Governing the Forms of Official Documents (公文程式條例), which was promulgated by the Nationalist government in China in 1928.
It states that all official documents must use the “national calendar” year, month and day format, but it does not define it any further.
The Beiyang government for a long time used the Yellow Emperor calendar, which was declared by Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) when he changed the official calendar and era on Jan. 1, 1912, which he named Nov. 13, year 4609 of the Yellow Emperor.
The act stipulates that official documents must use the “national calendar,” but makes no mention of theses or other kinds of documents.
If National Taiwan University and other schools are creating problems for students by rejecting their theses on this basis, they are abusing their powers and demonstrating how deep the bureaucratic mindset reaches.
The ROC calendar is unique in the world and it is causing problems for our people and students. This is the kind of uniqueness Taiwan does not need and it is the legislature’s duty to remove mention of the “national calendar” from the act or change it to “Gregorian calendar.”
This would simplify matters and make it easier for Taiwan to integrate with the international community. It is time to stop holding on to this anachronism.
Wang Po-jen
Taichung
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
RSS