President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently held a press conference in Greater Kaohsiung in which he should have focused on reconstruction after the fatal, destructive gas pipeline explosions that occurred in the city on July 31 and Aug. 1, but instead chose to cite a Wall Street Journal editorial on Taiwan to disparage the Democratic Progressive Party.
The piece Ma cited was published on Aug. 5 under the headline “Taiwan Leaves Itself Behind” and he used it to accuse and criticize the Democratic Progressive Party for boycotting the review of the cross-strait service trade agreement in the legislature.
The main thrust of the article is that Taiwan has to ratify the service trade agreement with China, otherwise the nation will only become more isolated.
However, this article totally ignores one basic fact: China is hostile toward Taiwan. Not only does Beijing have 2,000 missiles aimed across the Taiwan Strait, it is also preventing Taipei from participating in the international community and continues to reserve the right to use military force to take Taiwan.
At present, 80 percent of Taiwan’s foreign investment and 40 percent of its exports go to China. The majority of Taiwanese are worried that being so strongly reliant on China will ultimately be hugely detrimental to national security.
Taiwan and China are both members of the WTO. However, Beijing is not only unwilling to treat Taipei as a member of equal standing, it also interferes with Taiwan signing regional cooperation agreements with other countries. This is why former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) formulated his “no haste, be patient” policy to restrict investment in China.
However, after Ma came to power in 2008, he eased restrictions on cross-strait trade significantly and inked the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China.
This is why the majority of Taiwanese are against the Ma administration’s pro-China policies, which they feel leave Taiwan overly reliant on the Chinese market. This is also the motivation for the Sunflower movement earlier this year, which saw 500,000 people take to the streets of Taipei to protest an attempt to bulldoze the cross-strait service trade agreement through the legislature.
Unless China promises that it will not stop Taiwan from signing free-trade agreements with other major economic entities such as the US, Japan and the EU now that the ECFA has been signed, ratifying the service trade agreement will only make Taiwan more reliant on China in terms of trade, and place the nation in a very dangerous place in terms of national security.
Taiwan already has a considerably liberal economy, and ranks 17th in the world in terms of trade in imports and exports. According to information from the WTO, in 2001, Taiwan’s import-weighted average tariff rate was just 1.8 percent, which is 2.1 percent lower than that of the US at the time, 2.2 percent lower than Japan’s, 2.7 percent lower than the EU’s, 4.1 percent lower than that of China and 6.8 percent lower than in South Korea.
Despite this, the Taiwanese government should still carry out structural reforms to meet the conditions for joining regional trade pacts such as the under-negotiation Trans-Pacific Partnership, so as to diversify the risk that comes from being overly reliant on the Chinese market.
However, this should not be done with any precondition of signing the cross-strait service trade agreement with China first, and neither should China use this to stop Taiwan from signing free-trade pacts with other countries.
Wu Rong-i is a former vice premier and chairman of the Taiwan Braintrust.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
RSS