The constitutional issues created by the force of the Sunflower movement are percolating.
Last month, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) set up the People Rule Foundation to promote constitutional reform, and in May, prior to handing over the reigns to DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), former DPP chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) promoted the idea of a Cabinet system of government.
After Tsai took over from Su, she criticized the electoral system, calling it unfair in a May 25 opinion piece in the Apple Daily entitled “My Views on Constitutional Reform.”
In it, she promoted the adoption of a system of mixed-member proportional representation in which the proportion of votes received in an election would match the proportion of legislative seats awarded to a party. That was followed by a commentary by attorney C.V. Chen (陳長文) in which he expressed agreement with this view and said he had made the same suggestion two years earlier.
New Party cofounder Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) has also said that he favors a Cabinet system and that he feels President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should spearhead a constitutional amendment.
Most constitutional amendments have been technical adjustments to adapt the Nanjing Constitution, which did not have to address the current cross-strait issue, to the situation in Taiwan. The rest, such as the electoral system, were a matter of party interests. When it comes to the systemic design flaws proven by Taiwan’s current constitutional situation, no one, including Ma, either dares or wants to change them.
The fact is that this does not really matter, because reform is a huge project that requires the right environment and the right moment rather than depending on any individual.
In her opinion piece, Tsai mentioned the theory of transformative “constitutional moments,” which is based on the US constitutional experience, and said this was something that Taiwan could learn from.
According to this theory, the Constitution is a systemic blueprint that accumulates momentum for change after having “clashed” with reality.
Next year is set to be a year-long election campaign for the 2016 presidential and legislative elections.
First, that will give civil society a full year to pressure candidates into focusing on constitutional reform and forcing them to express their support for amending the Constitution.
Second, current regulations stipulate that half a year after a constitutional amendment has been passed, a referendum must be held. This leaves sufficient time for voters to put pressure on candidates and their parties to have a constitutional amendment passed by the legislature during the first half of next year and pledge to hold the referendum on the same day as the 2016 presidential election, or else it will never happen.
This first wave of constitutional amendments is to be initiated by the public at the ballot box, without support from the government. It should be directed at fundamental constitutional functions, and to avoid complications, the procedure should be kept simple and only include three items: Replacing the mixed-member majority system with the mixed-member proportional representation system promoted by Tsai and Chen; lowering the voting age to 18 years; and lowering the threshold for constitutional amendments. If only one amendment is possible, it should be the change of the electoral system.
Finally, presidential candidates should agree to step down after one term and pledge to move the country toward a Cabinet system after being elected. As this involves changes to the constitutional framework, it will not be possible if it is not led by the president.
The reason change is necessary is that history has showed that the current semi-presidential system in combination with the nation’s authoritarian past creates an incompetent “emperor,” and that the public’s hands are tied due to the guaranteed term in office. Without the cultural environment of the US, we shouldn’t expect US-style democracy.
For the president to step down after just one term will not be a loss: Once the president completes the Cabinet system using the presidency and national resources, the president of 2016 is very likely to be the prime minister of 2020.
Christian Fan Jiang is deputy convener of Northern Taiwan Society’s Legal and Political Group.
Translated by Perry Svensson
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS