Putting aside the heated discussion over student protesters’ attendance and courtesy (or lack thereof) at a legislative meeting for a moment, Taiwanese, regardless of political affiliation, should feel happy with what appears to be a new student movement in the making. This is because what the students are fighting for is not political ideology, but fairness, justice and a brighter future for this nation — the same goals as many student movements before them.
Student activism in Taiwan blossomed at a relatively late stage, with the most notable example being the Wild Lily movement of the 1990s. Before that, students were encouraged to focus only on their studies rather than on what was happening around them. The last thing that students or their parents wanted was to tangle with the then-authoritarian regime, which during the White Terror era could cost them their lives or see them jailed for years.
Mass student protests did not occur until November 2008, six months after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. The Wild Strawberry movement, which opposed police repression against anti-China protesters, showed the differences between modern-day student protesters and their predecessors.
It was the first Taiwanese student movement to make extensive use of the Internet, and the use of the word “strawberry” was a self-deprecating and ironic take on the term “strawberry generation” — which described Taiwanese youth as being soft, pampered and lacking self-discipline.
Since then, what we have witnessed has not been large-scale student protests dominated by political agendas, but rather activity on a much smaller scale, yet with more relevance to the needs of society.
Students have staged protests in Dapu (大埔), Miaoli County, and Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) over controversial land expropriation. Protests have also been held in Taitung County over construction of the Miramar Resort Hotel and in Changhua County over the planned Kuokuang petrochemical project. In Toufen (頭份), Miaoli County, they protested over illegal layoffs by Hualung Co and in Taipei over the controversial Next Media deal.
These students care about a wide range of issues, including the environment, human rights, freedom of speech, development of the media and national security. They maximized the use of social media and the Internet, with mobilization and communication almost exclusively carried out online. Their efforts have led to the changing of inappropriate policies and practices in many cases.
It seems that student protesters are trying to build their own brand of protest movement with creativity and a different mindset to that of their forebears. Gone are the sad songs and long speeches; they employ creative tactics such as telephoning a lawmaker’s office and playing the conversation on loudspeakers. They have their own patrol teams to maintain order, assign trash pick-up details and refuse assistance from political parties. These factors, along with the cause of the protests, were why the students were able to garner support from the public and also from their professors.
It was not an easy task for a group of 20-year-olds at a time when senior citizens are worrying about whether they will receive their pensions, especially when people still describe them as strawberries. These students realize that most of them will probably have to settle for a monthly wage of NT$22,000 and face a nation crippled by financial problems after graduation.
Many people realize that they owe a debt to these students for what they have done, because it was they, and perhaps only they, who have made the public’s voice heard.
There might never be another Wild Lily or Wild Strawberry movement and the prediction of the emergence of a new student movement could be premature. However, if more students would participate in public affairs, then Taiwanese will know that the country will be in good hands in the future.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength