The use of the TaiMed Biologics Inc case in the lead-up to the Jan. 14 presidential and legislative elections by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inner circle has been called Ma’s Watergate. However, it is much more serious than that.
Ma pretended that he was innocent prior to the election, but the appointment of Christina Liu (劉憶如) as minister of finance and Lin Yih-shih (林益世) as Cabinet secretary-general was a blatant attempt to interfere in the judicial process as it relates to the TaiMed case.
Watergate started with the activities of members of former US president Richard Nixon’s inner circle arranging a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters to steal documents. The burglars were caught in the act. Nixon made the situation worse by trying to halt the investigation and destroy evidence implicating White House officials. Had he not done so, suspicions about his involvement might not have been raised, and he might never have been forced to resign under threat of impeachment.
However, Nixon had then-presidential counsel John Dean who squealed, whereas Ma’s former secretary Yu Wen (余文), has protected his master.
His attempts to destroy evidence unsuccessful, Nixon later sought to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox, who refused to end the investigation. His insistence that Cox be fired forced the resignations of attorney general Elliot Richardson and deputy attorney general William Ruckelshaus, in what was later called the Saturday Night Massacre. It made impeachment a near certainty, had he not resigned.
In the TaiMed case, members of Ma’s inner circle, including members of the current Cabinet and senior members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus, conspired to break the law, blatantly altering confidential documents.
This was a hundred times more serious than the actions that led to the Watergate scandal. The Democratic Progressive Party produced the original documents to prove that they had been altered, but once again the Ma machine worked its wonders. A special investigative team was set up to look into the matter, but appeared to disregard the forgeries out of hand.
Even though Ma himself was not involved in altering the documents or in destroying evidence, he was well aware that Liu stood accused of forgery and that the case was still under investigation, yet he still chose to re-appoint her and Lin. This suggests he was confident the investigative team would return a not-guilty verdict.
Watergate had its own heroes — individuals and institutions that did their duty and held to their convictions about what was right and just. There was “Deep Throat,” the informant; the Washington Post, which stuck with the investigation; Cox, who refused to let himself be intimidated by pressure to stop the investigation; and Richardson and Ruckelshaus, who both resigned rather than sack Cox, as Nixon had asked them to do. All of these men held firm in the fight against the abuse of power by the government, maintaining the independence of the judiciary and the integrity of US democracy.
Ma has not been found guilty of corruption for his role in the alleged forging of documents by Yu; he has managed to continue as an incompetent president thanks to alleged forgeries made by Liu; and now that he has been re-elected, he is attempting to interfere with the independence of the judiciary. He wants to turn Taiwan into a land where there is no right or wrong, where there is no fairness or justice.
Shortly after his election victory Ma said more work was needed on judicial independence. Those who voted for him should perhaps engage in some reflection of their own.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS