The use of the TaiMed Biologics Inc case in the lead-up to the Jan. 14 presidential and legislative elections by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inner circle has been called Ma’s Watergate. However, it is much more serious than that.
Ma pretended that he was innocent prior to the election, but the appointment of Christina Liu (劉憶如) as minister of finance and Lin Yih-shih (林益世) as Cabinet secretary-general was a blatant attempt to interfere in the judicial process as it relates to the TaiMed case.
Watergate started with the activities of members of former US president Richard Nixon’s inner circle arranging a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters to steal documents. The burglars were caught in the act. Nixon made the situation worse by trying to halt the investigation and destroy evidence implicating White House officials. Had he not done so, suspicions about his involvement might not have been raised, and he might never have been forced to resign under threat of impeachment.
However, Nixon had then-presidential counsel John Dean who squealed, whereas Ma’s former secretary Yu Wen (余文), has protected his master.
His attempts to destroy evidence unsuccessful, Nixon later sought to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox, who refused to end the investigation. His insistence that Cox be fired forced the resignations of attorney general Elliot Richardson and deputy attorney general William Ruckelshaus, in what was later called the Saturday Night Massacre. It made impeachment a near certainty, had he not resigned.
In the TaiMed case, members of Ma’s inner circle, including members of the current Cabinet and senior members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus, conspired to break the law, blatantly altering confidential documents.
This was a hundred times more serious than the actions that led to the Watergate scandal. The Democratic Progressive Party produced the original documents to prove that they had been altered, but once again the Ma machine worked its wonders. A special investigative team was set up to look into the matter, but appeared to disregard the forgeries out of hand.
Even though Ma himself was not involved in altering the documents or in destroying evidence, he was well aware that Liu stood accused of forgery and that the case was still under investigation, yet he still chose to re-appoint her and Lin. This suggests he was confident the investigative team would return a not-guilty verdict.
Watergate had its own heroes — individuals and institutions that did their duty and held to their convictions about what was right and just. There was “Deep Throat,” the informant; the Washington Post, which stuck with the investigation; Cox, who refused to let himself be intimidated by pressure to stop the investigation; and Richardson and Ruckelshaus, who both resigned rather than sack Cox, as Nixon had asked them to do. All of these men held firm in the fight against the abuse of power by the government, maintaining the independence of the judiciary and the integrity of US democracy.
Ma has not been found guilty of corruption for his role in the alleged forging of documents by Yu; he has managed to continue as an incompetent president thanks to alleged forgeries made by Liu; and now that he has been re-elected, he is attempting to interfere with the independence of the judiciary. He wants to turn Taiwan into a land where there is no right or wrong, where there is no fairness or justice.
Shortly after his election victory Ma said more work was needed on judicial independence. Those who voted for him should perhaps engage in some reflection of their own.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS