The “three little pigs” donation campaign of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) signifies a further awakening among the public and represents a turning point in Taiwan’s democracy movement.
Wednesday was the 93rd birthday of Su Beng (史明), one of the pioneers of Taiwan’s nation-building and democracy movements. The Su Beng Education Foundation organized a concert to celebrate the occasion and this is a good time to revisit Su’s contributions and provide them as an example that may be followed during the struggles Taiwan may face in the future.
Director and orchestra conductor Tseng Dau-hsiong (曾道雄) has praised Su as a “national treasure.” Here are a few thoughts about the “Taiwanese values” Su embodies:
First, Su has spent both money and energy on his causes, making permanent contributions to social and political movements. He donated all the money he made from when he ran a noodle shop in Japan to these movements. Just as Tseng said, Su’s actions are true contributions and he has never asked for anything in return. This is very different from many politicians, who only think in terms of their own personal interests or the interests of whatever political faction they belong to.
Second, Su has both a theoretical and a practical basis. Despite being born into a wealthy family in Shilin District (士林), Taipei, Su’s heart is full of compassion and he has a strong desire to help people who have suffered major injustices. As a result, he went to study in Japan, where he came into contact with Marxism. He later went to China, where he worked as a spy against the Japanese and joined the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) armed struggle to overthrow the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After returning to Taiwan, he went into exile in Japan.
While working for the revolution, he also completed his significant work, titled Taiwan’s 400-Year History (台灣人四百年史) in the early 1960s, which became a classic theoretical base for the promotion of Taiwanese independence. Even after Taiwanese gained universal suffrage, Taiwan still faced many injustices and Su personally led his Association for Taiwan Independence Action, organizing and directing street protests, including in 2005, when former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) was intercepted on a highway on his way to catch a flight to China to pay tribute there. At that time, Su was almost 90 years old.
Third, Su has clear goals and strategies. He understands the CCP’s unification strategies. Therefore, while he employed radical means in the pursuit of his revolutionary goals, he has never acted aggressively in isolation, but always stresses the need to unite “progressive Chinese people” with Mainlanders in Taiwan who see Taiwan as their home and to ease the tensions caused by Taiwanese and Chinese nationalism. He has also stressed that independence and nation building cannot be realized by merely chanting radical slogans.
Fourth, Su is resolute and capable of self-reflection. While upholding his principles for Taiwan’s nation building and its democratic movement, he continuously engages in self--reflection and keeps in step with the times.
When he was in China, he witnessed the CCP’s inhumanity and made the decision to leave it and return to Taiwan. After the DPP lost the -legislative elections and the ensuing presidential vote in 2008, Su, widely viewed as “deep green,” looked at the mistakes the DPP made during its eight years in office and quickly came to support the new, reasonable and rational policies proposed by DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for reforming the party and for resisting the KMT from both inside and outside the system. His support can make more people better understand Tsai. It is indeed remarkable for a 90-something “revolutionary” to not be biased and to care so much about the younger generations.
Supposing the DPP regains office next year, it will have the tough challenge of implementing transitional justice. For the sake of domestic unity, it will not use simplistic and brutal methods. The “Taiwanese values” embodied by Su are also the same values of “passion, reason and forgiveness” Tsai announced at a rally attended by 70,000 people in Greater Kaohsiung on Saturday last week.
It is these values that will decide who wins the election and bring about the birth of a new Taiwan.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS