With January’s presidential election approaching, it is only a matter of time before government agencies and officials launch a public relations blitz to trumpet the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s record.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called for extra firepower for his re-election campaign yesterday by asking governmental agencies to increase their use of Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) in their promotions.
Policies that enhance public welfare and happiness should in any case be well-publicized so recognition can be given to the dedicated public servants who have worked to boost the nation’s standing and well-being.
However, it is a different story if the performance and policies of agencies and officials come across as more fiction than fact. It is despicable for a government to use taxpayers’ money to propagate lies in an attempt to sway public opinion — or when it only thinks outside the “Han box” and uses Hoklo or Aboriginal phrases at election time.
First case in point: The public was treated to a TV spot and ad in May produced by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) lauding Ma’s China policy as the “right remedy” that “safeguards the Republic of China’s [ROC] sovereignty.”
The ad’s tag line was: “Be the Taiwanese that walks through the front door with an air of confidence.” Before that, it took a swipe at the former Democratic Progressive Party government by saying that the Ma administration had ended “the turbulence three years ago.”
It is dumbfounding to note how easily the council lies through its teeth, talking about upholding the nation’s dignity when the truth is that the Ma administration’s China policy has led to the WHO referring to Taiwan as a province of China.
Another case of half truths was Ma’s touting of his modus vivendi policy, which the president has lately been mentioning at almost every public occasion to give himself a pat on the back.
Fond of using that phrase to plug his China policy, Ma says the diplomatic cross-strait truce he proposed has meant that Beijing has not poached any of Taipei’s diplomatic allies since he took office and the number of countries offering visa exemptions to Taiwanese has increased to more than 100 “without China’s opposition.” It is also because of his modus vivendi approach that Taiwan was able to take part in the WHO’s General Assembly as an observer and that Chinese tourists are able to visit Taiwan and boost the economy, he says.
What Ma does not say is that it was China’s nod that allowed Taiwan to take part in WHO meetings and it was Beijing’s “benevolence” that allowed some Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan.
Here’s food for thought: What has Ma done for China that prompted Beijing “not to oppose” Taiwan’s efforts to gain more visa-waiver agreements?
Rather than counting up all the items Ma lists as his administration’s achievements, it may be more realistic to credit them to Beijing, since he has really only been acting as its agent.
That being the case, it begs the question: What can truly be counted as achievements by the Ma administration when it comes to issues relating to the nation’s sovereignty and dignity? Unfortunately, not much, considering the lack of support and initiative shown when Taiwanese need the government’s help — as amply demonstrated in the cases of Taiwanese fishermen taken captive by pirates and taekwondo athlete Yang Shu-chun (楊淑君) being wrongly accused of cheating at the Asian Games held in China.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS