Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) launched his re-election campaign, he has not been able to stop bragging about how great cross-strait relations are. However, the breach of the Taiwan Strait centerline by two Chinese fighter jets is putting the Ma administration’s China policy to the test.
When two People’s Liberation Army Sukhoi-27 fighters crossed the centerline in their alleged pursuit of a US U-2S high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft a few days ago, the two Su-27s did not return to Chinese airspace until they were intercepted by two Taiwanese F-16 aircraft.
Following media reports, the Ministry of National Defense confirmed the incident, saying it was in “full control” of the situation.
In addition to the F-16s sent up to intercept the Chinese fighters, the military’s missile system was put on standby, the ministry said.
The ministry classified the incident as a sudden, isolated incident and said the Chinese fighters did not behave provocatively. Pan-blue legislators made excuses for China, saying it would not deliberately provoke Taiwan and that there was no need to overreact.
Although cross-strait relations currently are relatively stable, China does not recognize Taiwan’s sovereignty and still wants to annex Taiwanese territory: Facts that cannot be denied and facts that make China Taiwan’s potential No. 1 enemy.
If current cross-strait trade, cultural exchanges and the detente are tricking Taiwanese officials and the military into believing that there is no tension between China and Taiwan, while the Chinese air force treats the centerline as an arbitrary barrier that can be crossed at will, then the Taiwan Strait will become an undefended area, open to Chinese aircraft and ships, and Taiwan’s national security will be all but lost.
Regardless of whether the transgression was unintentional or a deliberate attempt to test Taiwanese response capabilities, the ministry should not treat the incident lightly. As supreme commander of the Taiwanese armed forces, Ma should not maintain a low profile — silence at this time could be construed as weakness or tacit approval, and then Chinese fighter jets really would be free to fly through Taiwanese airspace at their leisure.
Since any sudden actions could lead to war, the government must not remain silent: It must take a strong position. The ministry should stand up and tell China to restrain itself so that similar incidents can be avoided and not escalate into serious threats. Ma must also stand up to China at an appropriate time. Maintaining cross-strait peace is no easy task and treating these incidents lightly could destroy that peace.
Although current cross-strait relations are relatively peaceful, the nation must remain proactive and keep up its psychological defenses. The military must not let its guard down and neglect national defense. There has been no change to the fundamental nature of cross-strait relations: China still posses an existential threat and extreme vigilance must be maintained when it comes to national security issues. The breach of the Taiwan Strait centerline could be a deliberate provocation or it could be the result of a careless pilot, but the government should request an investigation and an explanation from the Chinese defense ministry, along with guarantees that a similar incident will not happen again.
A simple transgression by a Chinese aircraft can reveal not only the response capabilities of the Taiwanese air force, but even more importantly, it can also reveal the extent of the nation’s psychological defenses. After that is exposed, the nation will have no more cards to play.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS