Hate cannot drive out hate
I would like to share with your readers my thoughts regarding the reaction to Osama bin Laden’s death.
Let me be clear upfront, I am a US citizen and I condemn to the fullest extent the sickening schemes and actions of bin Laden on Sept. 11, 2001. Bin Laden deserves punishment without a doubt, and the victims and the families of 9/11 deserve justice.
However, I do not think that any problems have been solved with the death of bin Laden and I disagree with US President Barack Obama when he said that the world is a safer place without bin Laden.
By killing bin Laden, it in a way martyrs him among his many supporters. I, along with many others, would rather see bin Laden brought to justice. That way whatever sentence was carried out (even the death penalty) would be more justified than merely shooting him to death. We also know that with the death of bin Laden, another will rise.
I also find the celebrations of bin Laden’s death outside the White House disturbing.
People are celebrating death. What message is the US sending out?
Let me end with a quote from Martin Luther King Jr: “Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”
JESSIE LIN
Taipei
A failing grade for Rawson
Mark Rawson’s recent screed criticizing translators who he deems to be inferior to him was funny, or should I say humorous (“Experts better than native speakers,” April 29, page 8).
Mr know-it-all even has the cheek to tell readers of his rant who might write a letter to the editor protesting his, er, interesting, er, observations: “I can see many of them now preparing to fill the Taipei Times mailbag with indignant, linguistically flawed protestations.”
Well, I’ll take the bait, although I am not one to write letters to the editor.
Rawson should know first of all that readers do not send letters to the editor these days by snail mail, but rather by e-mail, and therefore there is no “mailbag” for the letters to arrive in. Instead, letters arrived in an inbox at the Taipei Times.
Rawsom could have done himself a favor by calling it a mailbox, rather than a mailbag, but then again, he’s the expat language expert.
Rawson tells us that “[in] his daily Chinese-English translation work, [he] frequently [has] to request clarification from Chinese clients as to the meaning of this or that Chinese phrase, because, not being an expert in the use of their own language, they have expressed something unclearly or nonsensically.”
Good, Mark, but one thing: this is Taiwan and your clients are Taiwanese, not Chinese. So much for how smart you are.
You don’t even know what country you are living in.
Mailbag? Chinese? I give you a failing grade, sir.
ARRON BECK
Kenting, Taiwan
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS