During the Lunar New Year, many temples try to predict the nation’s fortune for the coming year, but there is never one consistent answer. However, this year, two international incidents involving Taiwan have taken place that implying a gloomy the fate for the nation.
The first incident was the deportation of 14 Taiwanese suspected of fraud from the Philippines to China. Although Taiwan’s representative office in the Philippines repeatedly demanded the 14 be sent to Taiwan, and although it secured writs of habeas corpus from the Court of Appeals of the Philippines to prevent the deportation to China, Manila ignored Taipei’s demands. After the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong protest, top Philippine officials issued a statement expressing their deep regret — but not an apology — on Monday.
The statement said that Philippine authorities had decided to deport the suspects to China “considering that all the victims are Chinese, all the accomplices are Chinese and the results can be best settled in China.”
This statement deals a double blow to Taiwan. Manila had no intention of returning the suspects to Taiwan because it fears China. This was the result the Philippines weighing the respective power of China and Taiwan and acting in accordance with its own best interests. However, Philippine officials also ignored the decision of their own courts, forcing their judiciary to bow before China’s political might. This will not increase Taiwan’s respect for the Philippines.
The statement, which the Philippine government worked on for several days, trampled on the dignity of the Republic of China (ROC) by saying that the issue was a matter for China.
The ROC government has lost all face in this incident. National security agencies were unable to either stop the extradition or to obtain an explanation that was acceptable to the nation. This shows a serious negligence of duty. The foreign ministry said it would recall its envoy to Manila and that it would strictly screen the applications of Philippine nationals who wish to work in Taiwan, but that is clearly not enough.
The second ominous incident for Taiwan was the fallout from the unrest in Egypt. While every country was hurrying to evacuate its citizens, more than 40 Taiwanese tourists took a Chinese charter flight to Beijing, where the Chinese media made a big deal about reporting the tourists’ “heartfelt gratitude to the Chinese government,” and ridiculed Taiwan’s government for issuing a red alert too late. Not only was the ministry’s slow reaction ridiculed by the Chinese media, it also became a tool for China’s united front strategy. Overlooked was the fact the ministry had arranged for a Royal Jordanian charter flight that evacuated 129 Taiwanese on Jan. 31. Nevertheless, this incident was enough to wipe any remaining glory off the ROC.
The government’s preposterous behavior has given the international community the impression that the ROC has already been unified with the People’s Republic of China. This is not a good omen for the future.
The fact that the government is coming apart at the seams is nothing new, but if it doesn’t understand the importance of, and even feels good about, the fact that Taiwanese criminals are sent to China instead of Taiwan or that Taiwanese tourists in Egypt are treated as Chinese and sent to Beijing, not Taipei, then it is a clear sign that the ROC’s 100th anniversary may be one of its last.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS