Academia Sinica recently predicted that given a low base in 2009, last year’s economic growth could reach 10.31 percent. Disregarding this base of comparison, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) proudly touted his administration’s achievements, announcing his “golden decade” plan during a speech to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Republic of China (ROC). Ma carried on as if his China--leaning policies had helped build a solid base for Taiwan’s economic growth. However, this is very far from how things really stand.
While the local economy seems to have recovered, a major crisis is just waiting to happen because the government’s economic policies rely too heavily on China. If the Ma administration continues with its China-leaning policies, there won’t be any “golden decade.” In fact, it would be a miracle if Taiwan could even survive for another decade.
Taiwan’s impressive economic performance last year came in the wake of a recession after being hit severely by the global financial crisis in the previous two years. A slight recovery from this low gave people a false sense of security that the economy is experiencing strong growth. In reality, however, even government officials have to admit that few could feel last year’s recovery. Although economic growth soared, there was no corresponding growth in employment opportunities and salaries, and therefore most people did not feel any better off.
Academia Sinica cited three major reasons for this. The main reason is triangular trade, where orders are received in Taiwan and manufacturing takes place overseas. This makes money for businesses, but does not do much for workers. So how serious is the problem with Taiwan’s triangular trade? Recent data from the Ministry of Economic Affairs showed that as much as 50.95 percent — an all-time high — of all foreign orders for Taiwanese products were manufactured outside of Taiwan. This figure has kept increasing and has not fallen below 50 percent since it exceeded that level in March last year.
Taiwan’s economic growth is based on exports. Exports do generate massive amounts of foreign reserves and provide many job opportunities. However, after Taiwanese businesses looked at costs and moved their operations to China, the trend of receiving orders in Taiwan and producing overseas has continued to climb, exceeding 50 percent after Ma came to power. The information technology (IT) industry accounts for a large part of Taiwan’s economy, but 83 percent of all IT production takes places overseas. For example, Foxconn Technology Group, which has about 920,000 employees around the world, has only about 6,000 employees in Taiwan. Asustek Computer, including its manufacturing arm, Pegatron, has approximately 120,000 employees around the world, but only about 7,500 in Taiwan. These two examples make it clear that overseas production is hurting employment opportunities in Taiwan.
Most of this overseas production takes place in China, which means Chinese workers have absorbed many employment opportunities from Taiwan. When the economy slows down, Taiwanese workers are the first to be laid off, but when it picks up and companies start receiving new orders and increasing investments, many choose to set up factories in China and take on more Chinese labor. Taiwanese workers have been marginalized and most employers could not care less about them. Many have no choice but to rely on temporary work subsidized by the government — a program designed to boost employment figures.
The government insists that its China-friendly policy can stop Taiwan’s isolation, help attract foreign investment and encourage the return of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople. However, the economic data do not support these claims. From January to October last year, foreign direct investment in Taiwan — excluding Chinese investment — dropped 19.5 percent compared with a year earlier, while Taiwanese investment in China grew 130.1 percent during the same period. What’s more, Ministry of Finance statistics show that shipments to China and Hong Kong accounted for 41.8 percent of Taiwan’s total exports last year of US$274.6 billion. So on the whole, Taiwan is not only investing and producing in China, it is also heavily reliant on China for exports. The way China has Taiwan by the neck economically is an extremely worrying state of affairs.
Fortunately, the public is not blind, as many workers have become victims of the -government’s China-leaning policies. This is why the pan-blue camp lost badly in several recent elections and only just managed to hang on in the special municipality elections by milking all the sympathy it could from the Sean Lien (連勝文) shooting incident. In the end, the pan-blues still trailed behind the Democratic Progressive Party in terms of number of votes received. Again, in the first election of the 100th anniversary of the ROC, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was defeated, losing the by-election for chief of Nantou’s Caotun Township (草屯), a traditional pan-blue stronghold. This is another demonstration of public dissatisfaction with the government.
If elections show what the public really thinks about Ma’s China policy, so do the results of an opinion poll recently released by the Mainland Affairs Council. These opinion polls often sway in favor of the government, but in this case, the poll showed the number of respondents who support unification dropping to an all-time low, while those who favor maintaining the “status quo” and then independence surged to a six-year high. Those who supported maintaining the “status quo” in the broad sense of the word accounted for 87 percent of respondents.
In his speech, Ma gave himself all the credit for the “accomplishments” that will be made in the next 100 years. However, regardless of how hard he tries to wrap his China-leaning policies in pretty slogans and eloquent speeches, the public has repeatedly told him in opinion polls and elections: “Mr Ma, you are wrong.”
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
RSS