The five special municipality elections on Nov. 27 are developing into a strange set of elections. The ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is behaving like an opposition party as it goes on the attack, while the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) runs a defensive, stable campaign as if it were in power.
In addition to controlling the national government, the KMT is also in charge of Taipei City, Taipei County and Taichung City. The DPP, on the other hand, is using its best potential candidates for the 2012 presidential election in these elections, as former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) are running in Taipei City and Sinbei City. Some think Su and Tsai would prefer not to win, as they would not want to miss out on the presidential election. At the same time, they cannot afford to lose this month, as that would make it difficult for them to convince the party that they have a real chance of winning a presidential election.
Although Kaohsiung County Commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興) left the DPP to run for the Greater Kaohsiung mayorship, DPP Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) has a strong lead in the run-up to that election, as does the party’s candidate for the Greater Tainan mayorship, William Lai (賴清德). The KMT’s candidates in Greater Kaohsiung, Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順), and Greater Tainan, Kuo Tien-tsai (郭添財), are mounting a powerful challenge, with KMT -Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) campaigning in the south in an attempt to mobilize voters, although that seems to be having a limited effect.
Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) holds a comfortable lead in the Greater Taichung election. He has bounced back after a drop in support following the assassination of alleged gangster Weng Chi-nan (翁奇楠) and is now leading in opinion polls.
In Taipei, Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) is taking a drubbing amid allegations of irregularities related to the Xinsheng Overpass. He is trying to improve his situation by capitalizing on the Luzhou MRT line and the inauguration of the Taipei International Flora Expo. Although Su is the challenger in this race, he is calm and doesn’t look pressured as he continues with his campaign and proposes city policies mixed with occasional criticism of current policy.
Tsai’s campaign has abandoned the DPP’s traditional attack mode as she strives to build an image of rationality, while the KMT’s candidate, former vice premier Eric Chu (朱立倫), is urgently asking Tsai to engage in a televised debate.
After the Taipei District Court declared former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and co-defendants not guilty in their bribery trial, the KMT resorted to playing the “hate Chen” card to mobilize deep-blue supporters as they called on the public to protest against the verdict. The DPP, which relied on demonstrations during its early development, has avoided taking to the streets and is instead mocking the KMT’s anxiety.
The main reason the government and opposition seem to have changed places in this campaign is the KMT’s disappointing performance. The government staked all its bets on the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, Chinese tourism and direct cross-strait flights. Although economic indexes are rising, unemployment remains high and the wealth gap is increasing as salaries remain stagnant. As the public mood changes, it is only natural that the KMT is more worried than the DPP.
During its time in power, the KMT’s policies have strayed too far from public expectations, which has changed the overall political environment. These strategic mistakes cannot be put right by tactical advertising and demonstrations. The defeat of the Democratic Party in the US midterm elections would be a good reference point for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS