Last weekend, I visited some friends in Yunlin. Leaving Taipei, the scenery along the highway gradually changed from densely populated residential areas to large paddy fields that had just been harvested. Any traveler would be happy to see rolling fields of green as they pass by, but the owners of this land want these fields to be turned into land for construction because they see it as a way to get the cash rolling in. From this perspective, it is difficult to understand why farmers in Dapu Borough (大埔), Miaoli County, have recently protested the expropriation of their land.
Nobody would believe that Taiwan could face a food shortage, especially when they see all the different varieties of foods available.
As wheat, corn and bean production decreases around the world, so long as farmers are willing to plant rice, we can be sure that we will at least have rice to fill our stomachs, even if we can’t buy food at high prices on international markets.
However, all hardworking farmers are not necessarily altruists who want to provide food for everyone. Many of them perhaps have no other choice but to make a living through agriculture. Therefore, when discussing whether we should protect agriculture, keep farmland, or give extra assistance to farmers, we would perhaps be able to arrive at a more objective view if we put ourselves in the shoes of other people.
Farmland expropriation in Dapu does not revolve around a single issue. It also involves the way in which the government overlooked public opinion when the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was signed, as well as the dissatisfaction that was caused when the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例) was passed.
I am sure most people would be quite happy if they could sell off a piece of farmland for a price several times higher than the going market rate.
However, land expropriation involves the government forcing land owners to sell their land at a rate decided by the government.
Those unwilling to have their land expropriated worry about disrespecting their ancestors, and they also worry about whether the compensation offered by the government will be adequate to support their families.
The ECFA early harvest list added 18 agricultural products that will receive tariff-free treatment when exported to China.
However, will the farmers who produce other agricultural products benefit from this? Will the NT$150 billion (US$4.7 billion) compensation that was part of the Rural Revitalization Act really reach rural districts and farmers?
If the government’s planned policies do not offer reasonable compensation to those affected and are not implemented smoothly, even more protests could follow. The government’s claim that they followed “standard procedure, and so had no softer approach” in the expropriation of farmland shows a lack of empathy toward farmers.
The government did nothing to help the situation and only served to further infuriate the farmers.
I have a friend who wants to find about 200 hectares of farmland to plant lychees for export. At a time when most people do not hold high hopes for agriculture, this should be encouraged by the government. However, my friend has had to work alone and without government help trying to find people to assist him in purchasing and renting land.
The government cannot wait to tear up rice fields about to be harvested, showing complete disregard for agriculture. In the case of my friend, the disregard is due to the fact that lychees make a far smaller contribution to the economy than wafer foundries and panel production.
A few friends in Yunlin form a complete supply chain for the sale of animal feed, breeding, slaughtering and processing. They often make more than NT$100 million in annual income, which shows that agriculture is not necessarily as bad as people believe it to be. In addition, they also enjoy the sort of freedom that can only be enjoyed by living in rural districts.
A diverse society should protect the rights of people to work in all types of industries and respect different lifestyles.
Without farmland there can be no agriculture, without agriculture there will be no farmers and without farmers, we would have no rural districts.
The government should take the agriculture issues that lie behind the farmland expropriation seriously.
Lei Li-fen is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS