Last weekend, I visited some friends in Yunlin. Leaving Taipei, the scenery along the highway gradually changed from densely populated residential areas to large paddy fields that had just been harvested. Any traveler would be happy to see rolling fields of green as they pass by, but the owners of this land want these fields to be turned into land for construction because they see it as a way to get the cash rolling in. From this perspective, it is difficult to understand why farmers in Dapu Borough (大埔), Miaoli County, have recently protested the expropriation of their land.
Nobody would believe that Taiwan could face a food shortage, especially when they see all the different varieties of foods available.
As wheat, corn and bean production decreases around the world, so long as farmers are willing to plant rice, we can be sure that we will at least have rice to fill our stomachs, even if we can’t buy food at high prices on international markets.
However, all hardworking farmers are not necessarily altruists who want to provide food for everyone. Many of them perhaps have no other choice but to make a living through agriculture. Therefore, when discussing whether we should protect agriculture, keep farmland, or give extra assistance to farmers, we would perhaps be able to arrive at a more objective view if we put ourselves in the shoes of other people.
Farmland expropriation in Dapu does not revolve around a single issue. It also involves the way in which the government overlooked public opinion when the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was signed, as well as the dissatisfaction that was caused when the Rural Revitalization Act (農村再生條例) was passed.
I am sure most people would be quite happy if they could sell off a piece of farmland for a price several times higher than the going market rate.
However, land expropriation involves the government forcing land owners to sell their land at a rate decided by the government.
Those unwilling to have their land expropriated worry about disrespecting their ancestors, and they also worry about whether the compensation offered by the government will be adequate to support their families.
The ECFA early harvest list added 18 agricultural products that will receive tariff-free treatment when exported to China.
However, will the farmers who produce other agricultural products benefit from this? Will the NT$150 billion (US$4.7 billion) compensation that was part of the Rural Revitalization Act really reach rural districts and farmers?
If the government’s planned policies do not offer reasonable compensation to those affected and are not implemented smoothly, even more protests could follow. The government’s claim that they followed “standard procedure, and so had no softer approach” in the expropriation of farmland shows a lack of empathy toward farmers.
The government did nothing to help the situation and only served to further infuriate the farmers.
I have a friend who wants to find about 200 hectares of farmland to plant lychees for export. At a time when most people do not hold high hopes for agriculture, this should be encouraged by the government. However, my friend has had to work alone and without government help trying to find people to assist him in purchasing and renting land.
The government cannot wait to tear up rice fields about to be harvested, showing complete disregard for agriculture. In the case of my friend, the disregard is due to the fact that lychees make a far smaller contribution to the economy than wafer foundries and panel production.
A few friends in Yunlin form a complete supply chain for the sale of animal feed, breeding, slaughtering and processing. They often make more than NT$100 million in annual income, which shows that agriculture is not necessarily as bad as people believe it to be. In addition, they also enjoy the sort of freedom that can only be enjoyed by living in rural districts.
A diverse society should protect the rights of people to work in all types of industries and respect different lifestyles.
Without farmland there can be no agriculture, without agriculture there will be no farmers and without farmers, we would have no rural districts.
The government should take the agriculture issues that lie behind the farmland expropriation seriously.
Lei Li-fen is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS