There are many different ways for college graduates to celebrate their graduation day, but there is probably no better way to celebrate the occasion by expressing the patriotism of the young mind.
Hundreds of graduates of I-Shou University in Kaohsiung carried, wore, bore and held up the national flag in various sizes or put flag stickers on their foreheads at their graduation ceremony on Saturday. The move came after students learned that the school authorities allegedly removed the flags installed at the auditorium in a bid to avoid embarrassing presidents of the university’s sister schools in China, who were in Taiwan to participate in a forum scheduled on the eve of the ceremony.
Some students slammed the school over the “ridiculousness” of “not being able to show our national flag in our own nation,” while others said they felt “deeply insulted” by the removal of the flags.
I-Shou University president Fu Shen-li (傅勝利) said the flags had been removed because the auditorium was redesigned when the school hosted the 53rd Asia Pacific Film Festival in December last year. However, this did not explain why the school never reinstalled the flags after the festival and what the rationale was behind the new design without the flags.
The fact that the incident took place in the university that has the most Chinese exchange students among universities in Taiwan is significant.
While the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government is preoccupied with attempts to push through amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), the University Act (大學法) and the Vocational School Act (專科學校法) to allow Chinese students to enroll in Taiwanese schools and to give recognition to Chinese diplomas, I-Shou’s students are showing the school and the administration how disturbing the proposed policy is and how dissatisfied they are at the school’s and the government’s China-leaning policy.
Their voices were loud and clear, but did the government hear it?
Ho Cho-fei (何卓飛), the director of the Ministry of Education’s Department of Higher Education, told the I-Shou forum on Friday that the bills are expected to clear the legislative floor in an extra session to be held sometime between early next month and early August.
The ministry and the KMT may have to think twice now before taking advantage of the party’s legislative majority to force through the bills during the extra session.
Legislators have other bills that should be given higher priority if they were to hold an extra session, including a geology bill that would restrict development in sensitive areas or areas vulnerable to disasters, an amendment to the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法) and bills related to land preservation and disaster relief — bills that could help save lives in the next typhoon season and many years to come.
Lawmakers passed significantly fewer proposals — a total of 76 — in the spring session compared with the number of proposals that cleared the floor in the previous four sessions of the current legislature. Their best record was 134 proposals in the spring session last year.
It is time for our lawmakers to wake up and get down to real business.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials